[xmail] Re: Max SMTP threads logging

2005-02-23 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, February 22, 2005 4:49 PM: =20 On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=3D3DF6nke Ruempler wrote: =3D20 Hi Davide, =3D3D20 I noticed that if all SMTP threads are busy, XMail throws the message

[xmail] Re: Max SMTP threads logging

2005-02-22 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: Hi Davide, =20 I noticed that if all SMTP threads are busy, XMail throws the message 421 Server too busy =20 That is good, but imho it does not get logged anywhere, does it? That's XMail's way of logging. It logs to remote

[xmail] Re: Max SMTP threads logging

2005-02-22 Thread Sönke Ruempler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, February 22, 2005 4:49 PM: On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=3DF6nke Ruempler wrote: =20 Hi Davide, =3D20 I noticed that if all SMTP threads are busy, XMail throws the message 421 Server too busy =3D20 That is good, but imho it does not get logged