[xmail] Re: SSL + Attachment

2007-11-18 Thread Filip Supera
Good morning, Well, your server has STARTTLS enabled, and my server is configured to use TLS if available. So if you see those messages, it means my server talks fine to yours. I can't see how the size would make a difference. Hmmm, let me try to send you an attachment ... Well, this

[xmail] Re: SSL + Attachment

2007-11-17 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Filip Supera wrote: Hello, I've got two machines running XMAIL. One has 1.24 and the other has 1.25. I use SSL on port 465 for SMTP. When I send a message without attachment or with small attachment (I just tried with 3 22KO jpeg pictures), no problem. But, if I

[xmail] Re: SSL + Attachment

2007-11-17 Thread Filip Supera
Bonjour Davide, R=E9ponse au message re=E7u le 17/11/2007 =E0 18:57 : On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Filip Supera wrote: Hello, =20 I've got two machines running XMAIL. One has 1.24 and the other has 1.25. I use SSL on port 465 for SMTP. When I send a message without attachment or with small

[xmail] Re: SSL + Attachment

2007-11-17 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Filip Supera wrote: Seriously, in the very latest 1.25-pre series I replaced OpenSSL DLLs wit= h=20 the new ones I built based on the latest OpenSSL release. Are you sending from XMail to XMail, or from MUA to XMail? From=20MUA (Thunderbird or The Bat!) with XMail

[xmail] Re: SSL + Attachment

2007-11-17 Thread David Lord
On 17 Nov 2007, at 19:11, Filip Supera wrote: Bonjour Davide, R=E9ponse au message re=E7u le 17/11/2007 =E0 18:57 : On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Filip Supera wrote: Hello, =20 I've got two machines running XMAIL. One has 1.24 and the other has 1.25. I use SSL on port 465 for SMTP.