[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-23 Thread Chad Fleenor
XMail has now been running stable since Feb 19th. Just had to add export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4 to the startup script like Davide said. Thanks for the tip. Chad - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For g

[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Ken Larkman
The usual error the users are receiving is that the POP server did not respond appropriately. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 3:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with

[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Ken Larkman wrote: > Any ideas why Xmail might go inactive on FreeBSD? So far, I've not found > a log entry that might explain it. Can you give a lot more info about what you mean for inactive? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" i

[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Ken Larkman
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Ken Larkman wrote: > Is this likely to work w

[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Ken Larkman wrote: > Is this likely to work with FreeBSD 5.1, as well? I am having a similar > problem. No, this is a Linux/glibc only thing. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For gen

[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Chad Fleenor
.4.1? Chad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Larkman Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active Is this likely to work with FreeBSD 5.1, as well? I am having a sim

[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Dale Qualls
Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Larkman Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active Is this likely to work with FreeBSD 5.1, as well? I am having a similar problem.

[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Chad Fleenor
19, 2004 1:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active Is this likely to work with FreeBSD 5.1, as well? I am having a similar problem. - Ken -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi Sent

[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Ken Larkman
Is this likely to work with FreeBSD 5.1, as well? I am having a similar problem. - Ken -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail

[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Dale Qualls
Have you tried putting LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D2.4.1 in the xmail script? It may need to be LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D"2.4.1" I don't recall which. This is a known RH9 issue. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/19/04 12:10PM >>> I'm running XMail 1.17 and RedHat 9.0 and I'm having trouble with XMail staying active

[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Chad Fleenor wrote: > I'm running XMail 1.17 and RedHat 9.0 and I'm having trouble with XMail > staying active. It seems like I have to restart XMail at least once a > day. XMail stops responding so none can send or receive email messages. > I have checked the queue and I di