As far as I know, it does. ASSP greylisting is a bit of a mystery to
me, though, to be honest, so this aspect you should research. I don't
think it is using greylisting in the same way as XMail does but I am not
really certain (there is some sort of a greylist download that occurs
and is use
Jeff Buehler wrote:
>I simply disallow email of greater than 5 mb (that was my cutoff
>exactly!) - email is not ideal for large file transfers for a number of
>reasons, so I discourage it.
>
>
I agree, however some of my users may say otherwise ;)
I was thinking about scanning all messages
I simply disallow email of greater than 5 mb (that was my cutoff
exactly!) - email is not ideal for large file transfers for a number of
reasons, so I discourage it.
However, if you need to allow larger emails, then I'm not certain how
different your situation is - ASSP does a significant amou
Jeff Buehler wrote:
> Hi John -
>
>I use clamSMTP - it is c based proxy that is very lightweight and easy
>to use. I also use ASSP in front of this for anti-spam (so sender ->
>ASSP -> clamSMTP -> XMail -> sendee). As it turns out, after testing,
>the emails didn't even reach my anti-virus
I'm using my own script, currently running from "filters.post-data.tab"
(this may change).
It'll catch many attachments without the changes to the message, just
not all of them.
--John
Kevin Williams wrote:
>Are you using my Python filter or writing your own? I tested with file
>attachmen
Are you using my Python filter or writing your own? I tested with file
attachments, and it caught them quite well, but that was all I had to
test with. Improvements are welcome.
John Kielkopf wrote:
> Anyone else scanning mail with ClamAV?
>
> With just telling ClamAV to scan the "message file
Hi John -
I use clamSMTP - it is c based proxy that is very lightweight and easy
to use. I also use ASSP in front of this for anti-spam (so sender ->
ASSP -> clamSMTP -> XMail -> sendee). As it turns out, after testing,
the emails didn't even reach my anti-virus because ASSP blocked all of
