[xmail] Re: filters & performance

On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > That sounds pretty good, however, how about my fastcgi question? > > > > > > I

[xmail] Re: filters & performance

On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > That sounds pretty good, however, how about my fastcgi question? > > I told you the basic architecture, what do you want to know more ? > > > > - Davide > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list

[xmail] Re: filters & performance

On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > > > > > > > O

[xmail] Re: filters & performance

On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > > > > > > > O

[xmail] Re: filters & performance

On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks very much Davide, and yes, I agree but when I looked into it I > > > >

[xmail] Re: filters & performance

On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > Just wondering if anyone has found an elegant way to run a "fastcgi" type > > of filter with xmail under Windows where the executable that is spawned is > > a very fast binary that