[xmail] Re: undeliverable coming to secondary server

2004-02-07 Thread Dale Qualls
Perfect, works just fine. Thanks Tracy!!! >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/07/04 05:16PM >>> At 17:58 2/7/2004, Dale Qualls wrote: >Wouldn't this: >"thequallsfamily.com"[TAB]"*"[TAB]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" =3D >[NEWLINE] >actually sent all mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Will XMail = =3D >only send it the message

[xmail] Re: undeliverable coming to secondary server

2004-02-07 Thread Dale Qualls
Okey doke, I'll give it a shot, thanks!! >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/07/04 05:16PM >>> At 17:58 2/7/2004, Dale Qualls wrote: >Wouldn't this: >"thequallsfamily.com"[TAB]"*"[TAB]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" =3D >[NEWLINE] >actually sent all mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Will XMail = =3D >only send it the messages

[xmail] Re: undeliverable coming to secondary server

2004-02-07 Thread Tracy
At 17:58 2/7/2004, Dale Qualls wrote: >Wouldn't this: >"thequallsfamily.com"[TAB]"*"[TAB]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" = >[NEWLINE] >actually sent all mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Will XMail = >only send it the messages that it can't fine a real recipient for? Assuming that line appears in aliases.tab, it will

[xmail] Re: undeliverable coming to secondary server

2004-02-07 Thread Dale Qualls
Tracy: Wouldn't this: "thequallsfamily.com"[TAB]"*"[TAB]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" = [NEWLINE] actually sent all mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Will XMail = only send it the messages that it can't fine a real recipient for? >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/07/04 04:25PM >>> At 17:13 2/7/2004, Dale Qualls wrote: >Ok

[xmail] Re: undeliverable coming to secondary server

2004-02-07 Thread Dale Qualls
Thanks, I'll try the alias solution. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/07/04 04:25PM >>> At 17:13 2/7/2004, Dale Qualls wrote: >Okay, is anyone aware of how to have all non-deliverable messages go to a = =3D >central account such as [EMAIL PROTECTED] so anything that is not = =3D >deliverable to a "valid"

[xmail] Re: undeliverable coming to secondary server

2004-02-07 Thread Tracy
At 17:13 2/7/2004, Dale Qualls wrote: >Okay, is anyone aware of how to have all non-deliverable messages go to a = >central account such as [EMAIL PROTECTED] so anything that is not = >deliverable to a "valid" user goes to this undeliverable account? This = >way they can be looked at for errors su

[xmail] Re: undeliverable coming to secondary server

2004-02-07 Thread Dale Qualls
Okay, is anyone aware of how to have all non-deliverable messages go to a = central account such as [EMAIL PROTECTED] so anything that is not = deliverable to a "valid" user goes to this undeliverable account? This = way they can be looked at for errors such as typos and re-directed to the = real

[xmail] Re: undeliverable coming to secondary server

2004-02-07 Thread Tracy
At 14:01 2/7/2004, Dale Qualls wrote: >Wouldn't the backup simply give it back to the primary in the exact form = >that it originally received it, hence the smtp relay? The backup is = >actually accepting the message as (what seems to me) the primary would = >then responding that the user doesn't

[xmail] Re: undeliverable coming to secondary server

2004-02-07 Thread Bill Healy
the primary was available and wouldn't ever have to handle returning messages to sender or have frozen messages. Bill >-- >From: Dale Qualls[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 11:01 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [xmail] Re: und

[xmail] Re: undeliverable coming to secondary server

2004-02-07 Thread Dale Qualls
Hiya Don, thanks for the info, and yeah, it's making it worse, but this = was happening prior to mydoom. Wouldn't the backup simply give it back to the primary in the exact form = that it originally received it, hence the smtp relay? The backup is = actually accepting the message as (what seems t

[xmail] Re: undeliverable coming to secondary server

2004-02-06 Thread Don Drake
> Do you have the postmaster parameter in the server.tab file > for primary > server set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm guessing here but I > think what > is happening is the primary server is bouncing the mail sent > to "sales" > using [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the Mail From value. Since the mail is > usin