Lawrence Gold wrote:
>Check it out:
>
> http://x.mame.net
>
>In spite of its shortcomings, this should end up being a pretty nice
>release. Thanks for everyone's help. Please be sure to let me know if I
>forgot to apply any patches, and of course if you find any problems.
>
>
>_
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:42:32PM -0400, Shadow Walker wrote:
>
> first of all, on the xmame web site it written that this patch is an
> upgrade of pr2, I assumed it was an upgrade from pr3.
Copy-and-paste error. It's now fixed.
> I just tested the x11 target and for now:
> 1) I was unable t
Hi there!
I was trying to compile mame with the xgl display mode, and I got the
following output:
In file included from video-drivers/gltool.h:82,
from video-drivers/glmame.h:35,
from video.c:10:
video-drivers/glu-disp-var.h:15: parse error before `*'
video-driv
to apply a new patch, which option is needed?
This should do the job?
xmame-0.60.1 $ patch -p1 < patch.diff
___
Xmame mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 04:55:01PM -0500, Warlock Prime wrote:
> to apply a new patch, which option is needed?
> This should do the job?
> xmame-0.60.1 $ patch -p1 < patch.diff
Inside the xmame directory, that should work fine. If you don't want to
bother unzipping the patches, you can even do
Can't figure out whats the problem when compiling on this system. I've
attached the Makefile and its output.
Thnx for your time guys.
Makefile
Description: application/java-vm
./configure; \
make libz.a \
)
Checking for gcc...
Building static library libz.a version 1.1.4 with gcc.
Checking f
Looks like you are missing the X devel packages.
What OS are you running?
Joe
Warlock Prime wrote:
> Can't figure out whats the problem when compiling on this system. I've
> attached the Makefile and its output.
>
> Thnx for your time guys.
>
>---
I'm just wondering if anyone ever thought of implementing bzip2
compression support for xmame. I can't imagine it being to hard to unzip
all the ROMs and recompressing them using bzip2. Also, the verificaton
routines would have to be updated to the new files. Since a complete
romset is >4GB, e
Warlock Prime wrote:
> Can't figure out whats the problem when compiling on this system. I've
> attached the Makefile and its output.
> ...
> video-drivers/x11.c:13:22: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory
> In file included from video-drivers/x11.c:15:
> video-drivers/x11.h:4:22: X11/Xlib.h: No
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 10:13:38PM -0400, Scott Patterson wrote:
> I'm just wondering if anyone ever thought of implementing bzip2
> compression support for xmame. I can't imagine it being to hard to unzip
> all the ROMs and recompressing them using bzip2. Also, the verificaton
> routines would
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 11:05:26PM +0200, Joaquin Perez wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I was trying to compile mame with the xgl display mode, and I got the
> following output:
*snip*
> I have the nVidia kernel drivers, my system is RedHat 7.1 and xmame, with the
> x11 display mode, compiles just dandy
Attached is a tiny patch which should properly apply Benoit Dumont's
configfile changes and also correctly document the switch for the waveout
plugin: It's "-audiodevice", not "-waveout".
0.61.1-pr4-0.61.1-pr5.diff.bz2
Description: Binary data
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Scott Patterson wrote:
> I'm just wondering if anyone ever thought of implementing bzip2
> compression support for xmame. I can't imagine it being to hard to unzip
> all the ROMs and recompressing them using bzip2. Also, the verificaton
> routines would have to be updated
>Incidentally, there's been some talk on the mamedev list about replacing
>the CRC32 with MD5, and possibly incorporating support for 7-Zip:
>http://www.7-zip.org/
I've seen what people have said about this and 7-zip won't compress much
better than bzip2. It's <2% difference from what I've see
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Fogle Cpl Shawn B wrote:
> >Incidentally, there's been some talk on the mamedev list about replacing
> >the CRC32 with MD5, and possibly incorporating support for 7-Zip:
> >http://www.7-zip.org/
>
> I've seen what people have said about this and 7-zip won't compress much
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 20:47:21 -0600
Lawrence Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and possibly incorporating support for 7-Zip:
> http://www.7-zip.org/
>
> I understand it has even better compression than tar/bz2, but I haven't
> confirmed this.
I don't think there is a Linux/Unix port yet, is
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 11:37:13PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
>
> I don't think there is a Linux/Unix port yet, is there?
I don't think there is. Whoever is looking into adding support for MAME
is/was working on making the code portable. I'll dig around in the
archives and see if I can find out
17 matches
Mail list logo
