Hey everybody. I just upgraded from version .79 to .89 and have noticed
quite a few changes. The biggest one is the missing "Dial" option in a
game like "720 degrees". I am not sure why this was removed. Essentially
the arcade machine used a spinner like joystick. I am not complaining,
mind you. I
Nicos Panayides wrote:
Why is the group for installed files the "bin" group instead of "root"?
I am just curious :)
I don't remember, but I bet there was a good reason for it. There's
probably some patch buried in the mailing list archives that set it to
bin. :-)
_
Lawrence Gold wrote:
Francisco TLF wrote:
Hi.
When installing xMAME CVS I get this error:
installing manual pages under /usr/man/man6 ...
/usr/bin/install -d-o root -g bin -m 755 /usr/man/man6
/usr/bin/install -c-o root -g bin -m 444 doc/xmame.6
/usr/man/man6/xmame.6
/usr/bin/install: c
On Friday 17 Dec 2004 16:16, Matthew Earl wrote:
> > Is this for nvidea cards only or should this also work on ATI cards?
>
> I used the ARB extensions so it should work on all cards supporting
> fragment programs.
>
> > About the effects in opengl mode, could you make it work like the Xv
> > drive
Francisco TLF wrote:
Hi.
When installing xMAME CVS I get this error:
installing manual pages under /usr/man/man6 ...
/usr/bin/install -d-o root -g bin -m 755 /usr/man/man6
/usr/bin/install -c-o root -g bin -m 444 doc/xmame.6 /usr/man/man6/xmame.6
/usr/bin/install: cannot stat `doc/xmame.6
Christopher Stone wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 12:50:35 -0700, Lawrence Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's because some platforms just have old-fashioned compilers. Until it
becomes really burdensome, I don't mind supporting C89. But at some
point I imagine C99 will become standard.
According to
Hi.
When installing xMAME CVS I get this error:
installing manual pages under /usr/man/man6 ...
/usr/bin/install -d-o root -g bin -m 755 /usr/man/man6
/usr/bin/install -c-o root -g bin -m 444 doc/xmame.6 /usr/man/man6/xmame.6
/usr/bin/install: cannot stat `doc/xmame.6': No such file
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 12:50:35 -0700, Lawrence Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's because some platforms just have old-fashioned compilers. Until it
> becomes really burdensome, I don't mind supporting C89. But at some
> point I imagine C99 will become standard.
According to the gcc man page,
Christopher Stone wrote:
Maybe we should add -std=c99 to the makefile? Can someone remind me
what are the reasons for converting // comments to /* */ style, and
for ensuring no C99 code is in xmame?
It's because some platforms just have old-fashioned compilers. Until it
becomes really burdensome
Maybe we should add -std=c99 to the makefile? Can someone remind me
what are the reasons for converting // comments to /* */ style, and
for ensuring no C99 code is in xmame?
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:42:09 -0700, Lawrence Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Julian Sikorski wrote:
> > As usual:
> > sr
Julian Sikorski wrote:
As usual:
src/drivers/galpani3.c: In function `galpani3_mcu_run':
src/drivers/galpani3.c:257: error: 'for' loop initial declaration used
outside C99 mode
make: *** [xmame.obj/drivers/galpani3.o] Error 1
Fixed in CVS and a patch has been sent upstream.
___
Hi,
I tested recently xmame 0.89 and its video modes with
my good old Voodoo3 3000 video card, before I was
using the Windows version of MAME. So, first I
compiled xmame.x11 with some video modes: X11_MITSHM,
X11_XV, X11_OPENGL and X11_GLIDE, with GLIDE2 unset.
Well, AFAIK Glide3x currentl
Also, it might be a nice feature to have a random-noadult
game mode. As there isn't really a flag for this already for
each ROM, it might be enough to just have an exclusion list for
all of the known "adult" games, just to keep things friendly in
mixed company. I noticed some of the adul
> The problem with 1) is it requires rendering to a P-buffer,
> which
> according to F.J McCloud has performance issues. The problem
> Maybe 1) could be implemented as an option to xmame, that way
> people
> will understand why they might get performance issues.
I'm not sure P-buffers are the onl
14 matches
Mail list logo