I just noticed these warnings:
src/unix/blit/advance/xq2x_yuy2.h: In function
'blit_xq2x_line_3x3_lq2x_16_YUY2':
src/unix/blit/advance/xq2x_yuy2.h:66: warning: 'p2[0]' may be used
uninitialized in this function
src/unix/video-drivers/x11.c: In function 'x11_set_window_hints':
src/unix/video-drive
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Adam Thornton wrote:
> On Jun 20, 2005, at 5:39 AM, Pete French wrote:
> > I've been recently wondering whether it's worth me resurrecting the
> > NextStep/OpenStep/OSX parts of the Unix code. I havet tried
> > compiling it
> > in a long while, and the only one of those three
> And as a onetime NextStep user, I think I'd get better performance
> out of MAME on a nearly-free used x86 box than on any Next hardware
> that exists.
Heh, it was never going to work right on genuine NeXT hardware, thats
for sure - not even my "turbo" cube (33Mhz). But it did run really nic
On Jun 20, 2005, at 5:39 AM, Pete French wrote:
I've been recently wondering whether it's worth me resurrecting the
NextStep/OpenStep/OSX parts of the Unix code. I havet tried
compiling it
in a long while, and the only one of those three platforms still in
use is OSX - and I think Mac people
> I've had this idea in my head for a long time and its about time I
> shared it with you all.
[snip]
That sounds like an excellent idea.
I've been recently wondering whether it's worth me resurrecting the
NextStep/OpenStep/OSX parts of the Unix code. I havet tried compiling it
in a long while,
