[Xmame] error linking 0.99u1

The error results from double definition of config_init. I have renamed all it's occurences in unix tree to config_init_unix. Is it a good fix? Greets. ___ Xmame mailing list Xmame@toybox.twisted.org.uk

Re: [Xmame] error linking 0.99u1

Julian Sikorski wrote: The error results from double definition of config_init. I have renamed all it's occurences in unix tree to config_init_unix. Is it a good fix? Greets. ___ Xmame mailing list Xmame@toybox.twisted.org.uk

Re: [Xmame] Only 17 Historic Versions Still Missing!

Lawrence Gold wrote: On Aug 10, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Mame Fan wrote: Hans, One more request, please. Could you send me your copies of these two files? Mine have the right size, but are apparently corrupt. I checked the rest and they are fine. Please send them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Xmame] error linking 0.99u1

Julian Sikorski wrote: Julian Sikorski wrote: The error results from double definition of config_init. I have renamed all it's occurences in unix tree to config_init_unix. Is it a good fix? Greets. ___ Xmame mailing list Xmame@toybox.twisted.org.uk

Re: [Xmame] error linking 0.99u1

On Aug 11, 2005, at 1:06 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote: The error results from double definition of config_init. I have renamed all it's occurences in unix tree to config_init_unix. Is it a good fix? Greets. I made the same fix in the MESS CVS sources, except I named it xmame_config_init

Re: [Xmame] error linking 0.99u1

Lawrence Gold wrote: I made the same fix in the MESS CVS sources, except I named it xmame_config_init and also renamed config_exit to xmame_config_exit to be consistent. IMO it is a better name ;) ___ Xmame mailing list Xmame@toybox.twisted.org.uk