Re: [Xmame] debug_halt_on_next_instruction bug in mips3drc.c still present in u4

2005-10-31 Thread Julian Sikorski
Lawrence Gold napisał(a): > On Oct 31, 2005, at 12:19 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote: > >> Could you forward this to Aaron so that it will be fixed in next >> release? > > > Done. > > ___ > Xmame mailing list > Xmame@toybox.twisted.org.uk > http://toybox.

Re: [Xmame] debug_halt_on_next_instruction bug in mips3drc.c still present in u4

2005-10-31 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Oct 31, 2005, at 12:19 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote: Could you forward this to Aaron so that it will be fixed in next release? Done. ___ Xmame mailing list Xmame@toybox.twisted.org.uk http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame

Re: [Xmame] Problems on Athlon 64 processors?

2005-10-31 Thread Carl M. Fongheiser
Mike Crawford wrote: The last I heard there were some problems with 64 bit Athlon processors and the DRC modules. Is xmame still having problems with them? Does xmame have problems with those processors in 32-bit mode? If you have to use 32-bit mode, how much of a performance hit do you ta

[Xmame] Problems on Athlon 64 processors?

2005-10-31 Thread Mike Crawford
The last I heard there were some problems with 64 bit Athlon processors and the DRC modules. Is xmame still having problems with them? Does xmame have problems with those processors in 32-bit mode? If you have to use 32-bit mode, how much of a performance hit do you take by using it? I'm lo