[Xmame] xmame/xmess 0.37b13.2

2001-04-08 Thread Lawrence Gold
Xmame/xmess 0.37b13.2 is out! As usual, thanks to the many people who make these releases possible. A patch from 0.37b12.1 is available: http://x.mame.net/download/0.37b12.1-0.37b13.2.diff.bz2 The full version is at http://x.mame.net/download/xmame-0.37b13.2.tar.bz2 and mirro

[Xmame] Joystick under xmame-0.37b13.2

2001-04-08 Thread Lawrence Gold
P.S. Don't forget to keep the cps2.c file from 0.37b13.1 in case your joystick doesn't work under 0.37b13.2. Especially if your name is Frank Cox. ;-) I'm going to try to make this selectable at compile time in a future release or, better still, try to figure out just what it is that's affectin

[Xmame] Testing...

2001-04-11 Thread Lawrence Gold
Okay, the default reply-to should once again be the mailing list. This seemed to work fine for the old list, and it's what I'm used to. ;-) No wonder things were so quiet... ___ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailm

Re: [Xmame] Common problems doco

2001-04-11 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 11:51:00AM +0930, Matt Lowry wrote: > > PROBLEM 2 > * > I get a compile error with src/drawgfx.c that looks like this: >src/drawgfx.c: In function `read_dword': >src/drawgfx.c:37: parse error before `)' >src/drawgfx.c:41: warning: control reaches end of

[Xmame] Split version of drawgfx.c for B13...

2001-04-12 Thread Lawrence Gold
Anyone want to give this a try? - Forwarded message from Bram Sluijmers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 21:09:16 +0200 From: Bram Sluijmers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.2-nofw i686) X-Accept-Language: en To: Lawrence

[Xmame] [MC6489@mclink.it: Re: [MAME] Errors reported when compiling under Tru64 UNIX.]

2001-04-12 Thread Lawrence Gold
01 12:09:45 +0200 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sequence: 2929 Precedence: list List-Archive: <http://dspnet.claranet.fr/wws/a

[Xmame] [bram@sluijmers.tmfweb.nl: Re: hmmm...]

2001-04-12 Thread Lawrence Gold
: en To: Lawrence Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: hmmm... Lawrence Gold wrote: > On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 04:13:32AM +0200, Bram Sluijmers wrote: > > I surely was wondering what was taking drawgfx.c take so long to compile > > when I did my first b13 compile (xmame b12pre1

[Xmame] [MC6489@mclink.it: Re: [MAME] Errors reported when compiling under Tru64 UNIX.]

2001-04-12 Thread Lawrence Gold
X-Sequence: 2929 Precedence: list List-Archive: <http://dspnet.claranet.fr/wws/arc/mamedev> "Lawrence Gold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One of the xmame users reported the following list of warnings/errors when > building with the compiler that comes with Tru64 UNIX.

Re: [Xmame] [MC6489@mclink.it: Re: [MAME] Errors reported when compiling under Tru64 UNIX.]

2001-04-12 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 06:47:24PM +0200, Per Wigren wrote: > I'm going away for vacation in Marocko for a week tomorrow evening, but I may > find the time to try the patches tonight, if you resend the mail with the > patches attached this time... :-) I actually had resent the message, but it w

Re: [Xmame] small but very importnat...

2001-04-13 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 03:12:48PM +0100, Pete French wrote: > > I;m very happy that this was such a simple problem to solve though ! Thanks, I'll put this in b14.1. ___ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listin

[Xmame] xmame-0.37b14.1pre1

2001-04-14 Thread Lawrence Gold
xmame 0.37b14.1pre1 is now available: http://x.mame.net/download/xmame-0.37b14.1pre1.tar.bz2 This is a MAME-only release. Have fun. :-) Changes since 0.37b13.2: - Everything from MAME 0.37b14 except for 'steadykey' support. - Major updates to the files in contrib/port

Re: [Xmame] xmame-0.37b14.1pre1

2001-04-14 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 05:05:20AM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: > > Missing the drawgfx.c fix?? That fix was based on a 0.37b13 file, and I haven't had a chance to look at it yet either. ___ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.

Re: [Xmame] xmame-0.37b14.1pre1

2001-04-14 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 01:12:51PM +0100, Avatar wrote: > Hi > > Just downloaded it and tried to compile but I got the following error > messages... Here's a patch againts glvec.c which will at least fix the linking problem. But the vector flickering and orientation flipping are not implemented

Re: [Xmame] latest xmame

2001-04-14 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 11:47:23PM +0100, Pete French wrote: > grawgrx.c fixed, strdup() fixed, logerr() fixed > > excellent work! Wow, and the only thing I had to do was apply your logerr() fix. It's nice to see these kinds of changes "magically" appearing in the core. __

Re: [Xmame] xmame-0.37b14.1pre1

2001-04-15 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 01:53:23PM +0900, Shyouzou Sugitani wrote: > > This is an ALSA dsp driver update. > > * minor cosmetic changes. > * suppress bogus warnings about underrun. > > TODO: > * add support for ALSA 0.9 API. Thank you, applied. ___

Re: [Xmame] Question about -verifyroms option

2001-04-15 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 02:00:20PM -0400, Ste wrote: > > Why does xmame.x11 let me verify some zips and not others? Anyone else seen > this? I think it's the core's built-in rom "guesser" which is making it work in some instances. For example, try bublbobl.blahblahblah and it ought to work. I'

Re: [Xmame] New IRIX Drivers

2001-04-15 Thread Lawrence Gold
Is there any chance you could release these files under the MAME license, or at least add an extra clause to the header of the files allowing inclusion in xmame/xmess? Thanks! On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 11:22:31AM -0700, Brandon Corey wrote: > Well, after being sick of running an old version

Re: [Xmame] xmame 0.37b14 frame rate wrong

2001-04-15 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 09:09:29PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: > xmame 0.37b14 frame rate seems very wrong. > games like prehisle play psychotically fast. > games like miexchng plays far too slow. > > xmame 0.37b10 seems to get the frame rate correct on both. Most likely core bugs. The timing coul

Re: [Xmame] save state for nes?

2001-04-16 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:24:31PM -0500, Scott Rainaldo wrote: > How do I save the state of the NES machine under xmess? What key do > I press? The documentation only mentions where state files get > saved, not which key to press to save state. Thanks. This is off the top of my head, so it

[Xmame] Re: bug/problem report: xmame.x11doesn't show

2001-04-17 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 11:37:35PM +0100, mark ellis wrote: > I'm still investigating this problem. I managed to take > x11_window_create_display out into a standalone program and found it was > able to create a window on the screen, so I think there is something very > suttle going on here. I

Re: [Xmame] Duplication in xmame-0.37b14.1pre1

2001-04-19 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 03:26:37PM -0300, Marcelo de G. Malheiros wrote: > Hi Lawrence and all, > > Just a little quirk: the directories 'cab', 'contrib', and 'doc' are > duplicated in the latest release. They appear both in the top-level > directory and in 'src/unix/'. They should just be s

Re: [Xmame] Duplication in xmame-0.37b14.1pre1

2001-04-19 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 08:03:23PM -0300, Marcelo de G. Malheiros wrote: > > No, they are already duplicated in the tar file. Maybe you used the > '-h' option (dereference symlinks) when building the package? There > are no other symlinks in it, btw. Weird. I didn't use -h, and when I uncompr

Re: [Xmame] DGA not gracefully exiting

2001-04-19 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 08:33:10PM -0300, Marcelo de G. Malheiros wrote: > Hi! > > I've just noticed that in the last release (xmame-0.37b14.1pre1) the > DGA driver do not return the screen to the previous resolution as in > the old version I've got (0.37b10.1). > > Instead it leaves the s

Re: [Xmame] Duplication in xmame-0.37b14.1pre1

2001-04-19 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:19:14PM -0300, Marcelo de G. Malheiros wrote: > > But hey, don't need to worry about this. It's better to spent time > playing xmame, anyway. :-) True. ;-) I'll upgrade my tar version one of these days and give it a try. I'll be happy if this is the only problem w

Re: [Xmame] Duplication in xmame-0.37b14.1pre1

2001-04-19 Thread Lawrence Gold
Oops, I just found the problem with my tarball: The symlinks were replaced with real files when I did "cp -R" to copy my dev tree to xmame-0.37b14.1pre1 to tar it up. The 0.37b14.1 tarball should be better. :-) ___ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Xmame] Path from pre1 to 0.37b14.1

2001-04-19 Thread Lawrence Gold
Here's a patch from 0.37b14.1pre1 to 0.37b14.1. The announcement to follow... 0.37b14.1pre1-0.37b14.1.diff.bz2

[Xmame] xmame 0.37b14.1

2001-04-19 Thread Lawrence Gold
Xmame 0.37b14.1 is out! Many thanks to the people who have contributed to this and prior releases. Changes since 0.37b13.2 include: - Everything from MAME 0.37b14 except for 'steadykey' support. - Major updates to the files in contrib/porting. Added prep-new-mame and

Re: [Xmame] asm 68k core xmame-0.37b14.1

2001-04-20 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 03:56:57PM +0200, Matteo Catanese wrote: > X86_ASM_68000 = 1 > X86_ASM_68020 = 1 > > > > Linking xmame.x11 ... > xmame.obj/cpuintrf.o: In function `cpu_set_m68k_reset': > xmame.obj/cpuintrf.o(.text+0x1f38): undefined reference to > `m68k_set_reset_instr_callback' > xmame

Re: [Xmame] asm 68k core xmame-0.37b14.1

2001-04-20 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 04:38:35PM +0200, Vincent Kieffer wrote: > > It's a mame core problem. You'll get the same error if you try to compile > the DOS version of mame. > > The 68020 ASM core is still in development and is not working yet, even > if the option is already commented in the makefi

Re: [Xmame] /dev/dsp & co

2001-04-20 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:56:16PM +0200, Joost Yervante Damad wrote: > Hi, > > would it be hard to implement it that the > sounddevice is released when you put xmame/xmess > in pause mode ? > > I've tried both esd and arts and they're no good > solution for some soundcards, even when they're ru

[Xmame] [beosn@tiscalinet.it: Xmame XGL]

2001-04-21 Thread Lawrence Gold
Any ideas? He says Soldier of Fortune from Loki works fine. - Forwarded message from Tomaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Tomaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Xmame XGL Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 19:20:58 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99]

[Xmame] FYI

2001-04-23 Thread Lawrence Gold
...the latest romulan.pl and the patch for releasing the audio device while pausing have been applied to my latest tree. I think I forgot to reply to those messages, so thanks to Nathan Hand and Shyouzou Sugitani. ___ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [Xmame] Newbie question

2001-04-23 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 02:20:27PM +0200, David Heremans wrote: > > PPS: Lawrence, is the message loading.. part of the core or is it xmame, > otherwise you could perhaps change the text. I'm quite sure it's in the core. I'll look at it to make sure, though. _

Re: [Xmame] aRts Driver

2001-04-23 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 11:43:19AM +0200, Manuel Teira wrote: > Hello. This is my first mail. > First of all, excuse my bad english. > > I've just wrotten a driver for the aRts driver (the KDE sound daemon) . Well, > it's really an adaptation of the esound driver, but using the arts C API. > I

Re: [Xmame] Re: bug/problem report: xmame.x11doesn't show

2001-04-23 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 12:16:28AM +0100, mark ellis wrote: > Hi Lawrence > > I've attached a program, (xwindow, xwindow.c, compile.sh) which can display > a window (the window doesn't contain anything but it is displayed) Thanks, I'll have a look at this. I found out from someone else that th

Re: [Xmame] [beosn@tiscalinet.it: Xmame XGL]

2001-04-23 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 04:46:10PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > With a Voodoo 3 it probably does work well with SOF. > > However, I notice that he didn't specify which game(s) he is having trouble > with. As we here know (but he may not) a PIII 550 will likely not push the > most demanding games at

Re: [Xmame] xmame.x11 Missing the hotrodse switch

2001-04-23 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 10:56:09PM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > > Lawrence, if you don't get to this by the time I get my hotrod, I'll go ahead > and do the patch and mail it to you... I'll try to take a look at it tonight. Judging by what's in the MS-DOS side of things, it should be easy

Re: [Xmame] xmame vs KDE2

2001-04-24 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 12:23:49PM +0100, Martin Welch wrote: > xmame-0.37b13.2 vs recent cvs build of kde 2.1.1 to be specific. > > I'm trying to find out how to get xmame and KDE2 to work properly. It seems > to be a problem with the root window being obscured by KDE desktop. I'm > assuming tha

Re: [Xmame] xmame vs KDE2

2001-04-24 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:00:45PM +0100, Martin Welch wrote: > Lawrence, > > >>So far we haven't had any luck finding a workaround. > > So by we you mean the KDE developers? Are there any bug references > onbugs.kde.org I can track? "We" as in the xmame contributors. I've heard there are bug

Re: [Xmame] DGA not gracefully exiting

2001-04-24 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:19:37AM -0300, Marcelo de G. Malheiros wrote: > > BTW, is there interest in a command line option to force using DGA 1, > something like '-force-dga1'? I can come up with a patch if that's > useful for someone else... If you submit such a patch, I don't see any probl

Re: [Xmame] Feedback/Problems with xmame 0.37 b14 and Linux Mandrake 8

2001-04-25 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:03:18AM +, Mike Diack wrote: > > Any ideas what's wrong/a workaround? > It was fine under 7.2 This is a known problem when running under KDE 2.1.x, but we don't yet have a workaround. It looks like it may be a bug in kwin, since other apps (xfaxview) apparently ha

Re: [Xmame] Re:Linux Mandrake 8 + Question for Lawrence!

2001-04-25 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 05:19:47PM -0700, Dan Beimborn wrote: > > A question too- (Lawrence?) I'm trying to make my matrox g400 > work with DRI again, and for some reason I can't get it working > again. I have a agpgart module (modprobe agpgart > agp_try_unsupported=1, then modprobe mga). Anyo

[MC6489@mclink.it: Re: [MAME] [ste@jmrconsulting.com: [Xmame] Weird compiler warnings for some files]]

2001-04-27 Thread Lawrence Gold
Here's Nicola's response to Ste's report of warnings under gcc 2.96: They are legit, there shouldn't be a ## in front of _intcnt_ and _nvram_ inside the macros. Nicola Salmoria ___ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mai

Re: Re[2]: [Xmame] xmame vs KDE2

2001-04-28 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Martin Welch wrote: > I'm curious. I've not seen any cross posts on kde-develop -- are the kde > developers aware of this since it sounds like a number of apps are affected? Here's the info that pops up in the kde devel archives: http://lists.kde.org/?w=2&r=1&s=xmame&q=t

[Xmame] Patch to 0.37b14.2pre1

2001-04-28 Thread Lawrence Gold
There's a patch to 0.37b14.2pre1 available at http://x.mame.net/download/0.37b14.1-0.37b14.2pre1.diff.bz2 I would attach it, but mutt is broken on my ISP's shell account and I don't want to figure out attachments with elm or pine. Changes include: - Updated the romulan.pl scrip

Re: [Xmame] Tru64 Compilation IV

2001-04-28 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Per Wigren wrote: > Hi again! > > Ok, setting IL=static works. I just forgot that... > > The files that failed on b13 compiles now so Nicola's fix worked! :) > The warnings also went away. > However, I still get a lot of warnings: > > which = ++which % 16; This

Re: [Xmame] error while compiling xmess from 0.37b13.2

2001-04-28 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Paulo [iso-8859-1] Vinícius Vitto Ruthes wrote: > what about the previous version 0.36? because there's no > xmess in 0.37b14 and I'm interesting in trying xmess > because I can't find any genesis emulator working, Dgen/SDL > asks me for SDL1.0.x but I use 1.1.5 so it

Re: [Xmame] small suggestion for DGA1/2 user information

2001-04-30 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 01:12:26AM +0200, Christian Groessler wrote: > Hi, > > since I was not sure whether DGA1 or DGA2 was used on my machine, I > did the following simple change. This was with 0.37b13.2. > > Please consider it for future integration... It's going to take a few months to get

Re: [Xmame] strange behaviour of DGA on PowerPC Mac

2001-05-03 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 01:38:18AM +0200, Christian Groessler wrote: > > Since this a 8bpp display I'm a bit confused as to why this is > necessary. > > So I'm not suggesting to use this modification, I'm curious as to why > it is needed on my machine. Maybe something else is misconfigured. Tha

Re: [Xmame] xgl 0.86 (xmame-0.37b14.1 ; patch 16)

2001-05-04 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 06:26:47AM +0200, Sven Goethel wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > for short: > o Added option: > - glres x > Always scale games to XresxYres, keeping their aspect ratio. > This overrides

Re: [Xmame] XMame linking died....

2001-05-06 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 09:18:54PM +0200, Massimo Lauria as Gargamella wrote: > > > Linking xmame.x11 ... > xmame.obj/cpuintrf.o: In function `cpu_set_m68k_reset': > xmame.obj/cpuintrf.o(.text+0x25fb): undefined reference to > `m68k_set_reset_instr_callback' > xmame.obj/cpuintrf.o(.data+0x16a8):

[Xmame] [cnidarian@lycos.com: thank you for xmame]

2001-05-08 Thread Lawrence Gold
- Forwarded message from Cnidarian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 00:42:28 -0700 From: "Cnidarian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sent-Mail: off Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: MailCity Service Subject: thank you for xmame X-Sender-Ip: 64.80.101.8 Organiza

Re: [Xmame] 37b14 - Tiny compile broken?

2001-05-10 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:07:19AM +1000, Mark McDougall wrote: > Can't get this to work... What exactly does the tiny build do? Is it just a minimal build with very few drivers? ___ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/m

Re: [Xmame] DGA2 is DOA

2001-05-10 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:51:26AM +0100, Michael wrote: > Hello, > > Ever since xmame 12.1 came out whenever I run a game it will come up ok > in a window, but when I switch to fullscreen DGA the screen would switch > resolution and freeze showing the top left corner of the desktop. I've > tried

Re: [Xmame] 37b14 - Tiny compile broken?

2001-05-10 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:05:54AM +1000, Mark McDougall wrote: > Exactly. It was working back in v37b4? when I tried it last. > > It's really handy for driver development, because you don't have to > build the lot so it's much quicker, much smaller, and you don't have to > muck around with makef

Re: [Xmame] Alpha report!

2001-05-11 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 07:42:27AM +0200, Per Wigren wrote: > Anyway, xmame compiles fine and works great, but it opens a gigantic, > non-resizable window, only showing the game in the middle.. The window is > about 10x the size of the game! I used SDL as the displaytarget. SDL for me sometime

Re: [Xmame] Tru64 compilation part III

2001-04-26 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:54:58PM +0200, Per Wigren wrote: > Hi! > > I'm back from my vacation in Marocco and back to xmame compilation on Tru64! > :) > > I downloaded 0.37b14.1 and tried to compile. Now I get this that I didn't get > with b13: > > Compiling src/unix/main.c ... > cc: Error:

Re: [Xmame] Weird compiler warnings for some files

2001-04-26 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 08:55:22PM -0400, Ste wrote: > Just compiling b14.1 now and a whole lot of warnings I've never seen before > (that doesn't mean they weren't there before) popped out at me (bellow - > BTW these are the only warnings I get). I'm not as familiar with gcc as I > grew up with B

Re: [Xmame] 37b14 - Tiny compile broken?

2001-05-12 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:07:19AM +1000, Mark McDougall wrote: > Can't get this to work... Attached is a patch which should make the tiny build work for you. Please let me know how well it works. --- tiny.makSat May 12 23:06:17 2001 +++ tiny.mak~ Sat May 12 22:57:48 2001 @@ -1,10 +1,13

[Xmame] xmame 0.37b14.2

2001-05-13 Thread Lawrence Gold
All right, enough dilly-dallying: xmame 0.37b14.2 is out! (What better way to get MAME 0.37b15 to appear tomorrow?) As usual, thanks to the many contributors to this project. Changes since 0.37b14.1 include: - Updated the romulan.pl script in contrib/tools. (Nathan Hand) - The

Re: [Xmame] Alpha again :)

2001-05-16 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:13:52AM +0100, Pete French wrote: > > Anyway, have you tried going through and correcting these to see if > it works ? Would be iinteresting... The fix that the core people have been using when I've reported these is which = (which + 1) % 8; Speaking of which

Re: [Xmame] Alpha again :)

2001-05-16 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 12:10:27PM +0100, Pete French wrote: > > Now this may be an odd "bug" in the DEC compiler - I cant see anything really > wong with that line in terms of behaviur. On the other hand if the compiler is > complaining ythen I guess there is a good change that it may end up gen

Re: [Xmame] tnt2 xgl advice (some games crash)

2001-05-17 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 03:52:01AM +0200, Sven Goethel wrote: > > xmame.xgl -bpp 16 sinistar > > gives me segmentation fault after sinistar's internel check .. > > funny, the forced blitter stuff (-bpp 16) is buggy ? > (or i used it in a error prone way - error prone for only some games ?) It

Re: [Xmame] new ALSA dsp plugin patch

2001-05-17 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 11:07:08AM +0900, Shyouzou Sugitani wrote: > > This is an ALSA dsp plugin update. > > * add preliminary support for ALSA 0.9 API. > * split of the 0.5 and 0.9 API stuff into separate files. Thanks, I'll put this in my tree. _

Re: [Xmame] aRts Driver

2001-05-20 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:20:24PM +0200, Manuel Teira wrote: > > Lawrence, are you going to add the driver to the trunk? I would like you to > do it, because it doesn't hurt, and so it would be easier for me to keep > improving it. I just added an aRts driver to the trunk a couple of days ago

Re: [Xmame] NeoGeo

2001-05-23 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 10:55:47AM +, Per Wigren wrote: > I'm running XMame on my Intelbox right now, but some of the > Neo Geo games (at least Neodrift and one more which I can't > remember which it was) have a "box" at the bottom > saying "IRQ2 enabled, need raster driver"... What is tha

Re: [Xmame] Can't make {gl,fx}mame-0.37b14 within rh71

2001-05-24 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 05:20:13PM -0500, 'Aztec Eagle' Turbo wrote: > > Hi! > > Just rebuild xmame-0.37b14. It works! Even I can use my Sidewinder > FreeStyle Pro USB! It's supported within kernel 2.4.2 :-) But I > was unable to rebuild glmame and fxmame. > > # make > [ bla, bla, bla ] > Linki

Re: [Xmame] Compiling Xmame 0.37b14-2 with Glide under X11

2001-05-24 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 01:03:21PM +0200, Francois Duprez wrote: > When i trie to compile Xmame 0.37b14-2 with Glide under X11 i get the folowing > errors: > What im i doing wrong?? Nothing. :-) The Glide sources just didn't get updated to match some core changes that happened recently. I'll

Re: [Xmame] xmame b15 warnings

2001-05-25 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 10:33:57PM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > Most of the pasting warnings you got with gcc 2.96 are now gone, cheers > Nicola, however a few still exist. Attached is the warnings output from b15. Thanks, I'll pass these on to Nicola & co. P.S. xmame-0.37b15.1 is almost

Re: [Xmame] Redhat Linux 7.2 and Sidewinder gamepad

2001-05-26 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 12:41:50AM -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > Well, don't I feel stupid. > > All of the previously mentioned problems with my Sidewinder gamepad are solved by >simply using the -joytype 4 parameter. > > I thought I had set that before... Sheesh I love when the solution ends

[Xmame] xmame-0.37b15.1

2001-05-26 Thread Lawrence Gold
xmame-0.37b15.1 is now available. Kudos to the xmame contributors and the great job done by the core developers. The full sources are available: http://x.mame.net/download/xmame-0.37b15.1.tar.bz2 as well as a patch from 0.37b14.2: http://x.mame.net/download/0.37b14.2-0.37b15.

Re: [Xmame] .dat files no longer included?

2001-05-27 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 03:02:03PM -0400, Ste wrote: > I just installed xmame b15.1 on my friend's box and noticed that > cheat.dat, history.dat, and mameinfo.dat are no longer included in the > dist. I went back to b14.2 and it's they're not there either. Have they > left the xmame dist.? > > I

Re: [Xmame] Which xmame is the best

2001-05-28 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 08:11:29PM -0500, Markus A. Kobold wrote: > Ok this is probably a stupid question but i am compelled to ask.. > BTW thanks for the hotrodse switches :) > i compiled xmame for x11 and sdl and i see noticable differences in > preformance and > i am just curious which version

Re: [Xmame] fileio.o error while compiling

2001-05-29 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 02:26:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using Mandrake Linux 8 and try to compile xmame-0.37b14.2 or 14.1 and I > always get the error message that it cannot find the fileio.o object in the > specified directory (osdepend). I'm using makefile.unix for make

Re: [Xmame] Sound bug for 'chopper'

2001-05-30 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 12:31:13AM +0200, Krister Walfridsson wrote: > [This is a core bug, but I think I remember Hans saying that we should > send all bugs through Lawrence, or is it only true for xmame-specific > stuff?] I think the core folks prefer dealing with one person. I'll forward your

Re: [Xmame] asm xcpsmame

2001-05-30 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 06:53:34PM -0400, Hugh Greenberg wrote: > Yeah, it is with your patch, but I was having the same problem before your > patch came out. Even an unpatched xmame compiled with asm won't work for > me. The same thing happens. I am using nasm 0.98. Oh well. Have you tried en

Re: [Xmame] DGA2 wierdness

2001-06-04 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 05:42:36PM -0500, Bryan J. Cassidy wrote: > > Off the top of my head, some roms that work fine include dkong, gauntlet, and > mslug. Roms that kill X when exiting fullscreen include mslug2, mslugx, and > megaman. If a larger list of roms that work/don't work would help,

Re: [Xmame] DGA2 wierdness

2001-06-05 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 07:35:15PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Now that NVidia finally fixed DGA2 in their drivers and I can use it > at 24bpp again, I'm seeing similar problems - exiting from full screen > after switching with alt-home leaves the keyboard input hosed. > Running xmame aga

Re: [Xmame] Please, help me.....

2001-06-07 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 12:05:28PM +0200, Tomaso wrote: > Thanks, my NVIDIA drivers work well, but with the latest xmame, compiling for > xgl, I get many errors in glu-disp-var.h (parse error before '*'). > What can I do? There's a comment in makefile.unix about setting GLCFLAGS to some value (I

Re: [Xmame] many roms not working (for me) with b15

2001-06-09 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:28:32PM -0400, Ste wrote: > Thanks for the tip. It didn't seem to help though. Bublbobl comes up > with a white screen no sound, flstory still doesn't display any > animations. I disabled 68000 engine, as I thought it could be a culprit. > Still no luck. I tried forcing

Re: [Xmame] many roms not working (for me) with b15

2001-06-11 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 01:44:46PM -0400, Ste wrote: > Hi, > I'm not sure why it wouldn't work for me. I'm using Mandrake 8.0 and gcc > 2.96. Using X 4.0.3 and Nvdia's new drivers. I wonder if it could be a gcc 2.96 problem. Any chance you can install gcc 2.95.3 on the side and give it a try?

Re: [Xmame] many roms not working (for me) with b15

2001-06-11 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 01:44:46PM -0400, Ste wrote: > Hi, > I'm not sure why it wouldn't work for me. I'm using Mandrake 8.0 and gcc > 2.96. Using X 4.0.3 and Nvdia's new drivers. Oh, one other thing worth trying before giving gcc 2.95.3 a shot: Are you using a high level of optimization? If s

Re: [Xmame] ARTS Driver

2001-06-11 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 12:23:02PM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > Hi, > > I tried uncommenting one of the ARTS drivers in the makefile.unix but when I > run xmame.x11 -lmp only the oss driver shows up as an option. Anyone else > have any luck getting the new ARTS drivers to compile with xma

Re: [Xmame] xf4 configs

2001-06-11 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 04:12:25PM -0700, Dan Beimborn wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks to some RTFM-ing, I was able to compile an xmame.xgl > that works on my geforce2mx card. Wow, that sure looks nice :) > > A few questions though. The tricky part of this for me was > actually in the setup of my glx

[Xmame] [jms3117@utdallas.edu: xmame]

2001-06-13 Thread Lawrence Gold
- Forwarded message from John M Seehagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: jms3117 owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 01:26:41 -0500 (CDT) From: John M Seehagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xmame just wanted to confirm

[Xmame] [jms3117@utdallas.edu: Re: xmame]

2001-06-13 Thread Lawrence Gold
Forwarding this mainly for the k6 info... - Forwarded message from John M Seehagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: jms3117 owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:33:39 -0500 (CDT) From: John M Seehagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: L

Re: [Xmame] xf4 configs

2001-06-14 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 04:12:25PM -0700, Dan Beimborn wrote: > A few questions though. The tricky part of this for me was > actually in the setup of my glx /x. Anyone have a working > config for a matrox g400? A howto that would explain how > I could get it working? I'll try to get you my file t

Re: [Xmame] [jms3117@utdallas.edu: Re: xmame]

2001-06-14 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:36:59AM +0100, Pete French wrote: > > As far as I know this only happens if you are using unsafe optionsations > onb the compiler - i.e. using -O2, -O3 or larger. Try compiling > with just -O turned on (strip out all those other odd, optimisations too) and > see if it

Re: [Xmame] xf4 configs

2001-06-14 Thread Lawrence Gold
For those who are interested, here's the XF86Config I use with my G400. BTW, I'm going to be out of town until Sunday afternoon. Between that, and the power outages, and me forgetting a bunch of messages I glanced at on my vacation, I've got a little catch-up to do. For example, I came across M

Re: [Xmame] Hiscores

2001-06-14 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 11:47:54PM +0100, mark ellis wrote: > Hi > > Does the Hiscore functionality work with xmame? > > I have a hiscore.dat file. > > I test with pacman but no hiscores are saved. > > I have checked that the hiscore.dat file is loaded. > > I am missing something obvious? I

Re: [Xmame] Compiler options

2001-06-14 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 01:18:18PM +0100, Pete French wrote: > I just tried out 15.1 - excellent wrks first time, no compile problems > or anything on the systems I have tried it on - am about to do > an OSX build as well. > > A couple of things I;ve beenmulling over recently.. > > 1) In the Mak

[Xmame] [unknownoo@yahoo.com.tw: About compile xmame(xgl).....]

2001-06-14 Thread Lawrence Gold
Any ideas? I don't have the specifics of his/her setup available, so I'm not sure how useful this report is. - Forwarded message from Unknown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - X-Apparently-From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Unknown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Lawrence Gold

Re: [Xmame] [jms3117@utdallas.edu: Re: xmame]

2001-06-15 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:14:53AM +0100, Pete French wrote: > > GCC isnt bad - its just that the -O2 optimisations are very difficult > to do on small register set machines, and it sometimes gets it wrong. > I think the main bug is in streght-reduce, but every time they seem to > fix it someone

Re: [Xmame] gcc 3.0?

2001-06-18 Thread Lawrence Gold
These might actually be valid output due to GCC 3.0's stricter ANSI-compliance. In the past, when I've forwarded similar error messages to Nicola based on GCC 2.96, he's treated them as valid. On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 07:58:23PM -0400, Joe Ceklosky wrote: > Chris, > > No go...here is some output

[Xmame] Some tips about installing gcc 3.0 from source...

2001-06-20 Thread Lawrence Gold
In case anyone is going to install gcc 3.0 from source, here are a couple of hints: 1. If, after installing gcc, you are unable to compile programs which try to #include header files in /usr/local/include, you might need to edit your platform's config header file and add #define LOCAL_IN

Re: [Xmame] Some tips about installing gcc 3.0 from source...

2001-06-21 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 04:15:54AM -0700, Carson Gaspar wrote: > > That's why you build stage 2 (the compiler compiling itself), to avoid bugs > in your existing compiler. Did you install the stage1 compiler? > > (Of course, the gcc build process may have changed, but that's the way it > _used

Re: [Xmame] Graphics corruption in Space Harrier & AfterBurner

2001-06-21 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:55:41AM +0100, Alastair Robinson wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Does anyone know why the sprites in Space Harrier and Afterburner are > slightly corrupted with XMAME, while the self-same roms and MAME32 revision > are glitch-free? I don't see that kind of corruption here. Whi

Re: [Xmame] FULL fullscreen support

2001-06-23 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:08:54PM -0400, Scott L. Patterson wrote: > Carlos Calzada Grau wrote: > > I added the "400x300" and "320x240" modelines as given above for my > Voodoo Banshee and it worked. You made one very happy, Linux gamer:) > > A follow up question, how does MAME know to change

Re: [Xmame] RADEON and DGA2.0

2001-06-27 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 12:19:15PM +0900, Shyouzou Sugitani wrote: > > Just an FYI. > > Yesterday I've got a RADEON VE, and confirmed that xmame does not work > with the RADEON's DGA(both 4.1.0 and CVS). > So, I made a patch for xfree86 and sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Other than xmame not work

Re: [Xmame] Stretching

2001-07-02 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 03:57:59PM +0200, Stefano Priore wrote: > Does/will xmame support the -effect switch and the resolution stretching > code that Aaron has recently added to main core? I was planning to look into that (along with making another attempt to get steadykey support working), but

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >