Re: [Xmame] Question About The M68000 Assembler Core...

2005-03-09 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Feb 23, 2005, at 5:18 AM, smf wrote: I haven't heard anything official and definitive, but my impression is that there is not going to be any great effort to maintain the ASM cores for the 68000 and 68020. Thats right, Haze took it out as it didn't work for the sega games. If someone had subm

Re: [Xmame] Question About The M68000 Assembler Core...

2005-02-23 Thread smf
I haven't heard anything official and definitive, but my impression is that there is not going to be any great effort to maintain the ASM cores for the 68000 and 68020. Thats right, Haze took it out as it didn't work for the sega games. If someone had submitted a fix then it would have stayed in

Re: [Xmame] Question About The M68000 Assembler Core...

2005-02-23 Thread Lawrence Gold
Robert Alan Byer wrote: I noticed in the CVS archive that in src/rules.mak the X86 assembler core for the M68000 and M68020 are no longer there and the C code is used. Is this going to be a permenant change? I was testing out my OpenVMS build script on the latest CVS core to make sure it would b

Re: [Xmame] Question About The M68000 Assembler Core...

2005-02-19 Thread Robert Alan Byer
Paul Priest wrote: Robert Alan Byer wrote: One last thing. If the M68000, M68020 and MIPS assembler cores are going away, I would appreciate fixing the M68000 CPU sections in the "src/rules.mak" so that M68000_GENERATED_OBJS are on the CPUOBJS line like the rest of the CPU cores as that would sa

Re: [Xmame] Question About The M68000 Assembler Core...

2005-02-19 Thread Paul Priest
Robert Alan Byer wrote: One last thing. If the M68000, M68020 and MIPS assembler cores are going away, I would appreciate fixing the M68000 CPU sections in the "src/rules.mak" so that M68000_GENERATED_OBJS are on the CPUOBJS line like the rest of the CPU cores as that would save me from doing a s

Re: [Xmame] Question About The M68000 Assembler Core...

2005-02-19 Thread Robert Alan Byer
One last thing. If the M68000, M68020 and MIPS assembler cores are going away, I would appreciate fixing the M68000 CPU sections in the "src/rules.mak" so that M68000_GENERATED_OBJS are on the CPUOBJS line like the rest of the CPU cores as that would save me from doing a seperate search and par

Re: [Xmame] Question About The M68000 Assembler Core...

2005-02-19 Thread Robert Alan Byer
> >>I noticed in the CVS archive that in src/rules.mak the X86 assembler core >>for the M68000 and M68020 are no longer there and the C code is used. >> >>Is this going to be a permenant change? >> >> >For core MAME, yes the ASM 68000 is dead. I guess there is nothing >stopping Lawrence adding it b

Re: [Xmame] Question About The M68000 Assembler Core...

2005-02-19 Thread Paul Priest
Robert Alan Byer wrote: I noticed in the CVS archive that in src/rules.mak the X86 assembler core for the M68000 and M68020 are no longer there and the C code is used. Is this going to be a permenant change? For core MAME, yes the ASM 68000 is dead. I guess there is nothing stopping Lawrence

[Xmame] Question About The M68000 Assembler Core...

2005-02-19 Thread Robert Alan Byer
I noticed in the CVS archive that in src/rules.mak the X86 assembler core for the M68000 and M68020 are no longer there and the C code is used. Is this going to be a permenant change? I was testing out my OpenVMS build script on the latest CVS core to make sure it would build when I discovered