Re: [Xmame] compiling .65

2003-03-05 Thread Simon Roby
Benjamin FRANCOIS wrote: On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 22:26:14 +0100 Benoit DUMONT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I also have a SB PCI 128 and even after installing alsa 0.9 rc2, I can't activate the feature that allow "hardware mixing". The only way I found to be able to play 2 sounds at the same time is to us

Re: [Xmame] compiling .65

2003-03-05 Thread Benjamin FRANCOIS
On 05 Mar 2003 18:45:45 -0500 Caleb Shay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have you tried xmame.x11 -list-alsa-pcm and xmame.x11 -alsa-pcm? Yup, you're right, it might come from here. The truth is, the output from -list-alsa-pcm is so huge and so obfuscated I haven't taken proper time yet to study the

Re: [Xmame] compiling .65

2003-03-05 Thread Caleb Shay
Have you tried xmame.x11 -list-alsa-pcm and xmame.x11 -alsa-pcm? Caleb On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 19:21, Benjamin FRANCOIS wrote: > On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 22:26:14 +0100 > Benoit DUMONT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I also have a SB PCI 128 and even after installing alsa 0.9 rc2, I > > can't activate

Re: [Xmame] compiling .65

2003-03-05 Thread Benjamin FRANCOIS
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 22:26:14 +0100 Benoit DUMONT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also have a SB PCI 128 and even after installing alsa 0.9 rc2, I > can't activate the feature that allow "hardware mixing". The only way > I found to be able to play 2 sounds at the same time is to use artsd > but I am

Re: [Xmame] compiling .65

2003-03-05 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 10:26:14PM +0100, Benoit DUMONT wrote: > > I also have a SB PCI 128 and even after installing alsa 0.9 rc2, I can't > activate the feature that allow "hardware mixing". The only way I found to be > able to play 2 sounds at the same time is to use artsd but I am not very

Re: [Xmame] compiling .65

2003-03-05 Thread Benoit DUMONT
Le Mardi 4 Mars 2003 18:27, Benjamin FRANCOIS a écrit : > On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 08:43:21 -0500 > > "C. Ulrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there any advantage to using the alsa ouput over instead of OSS? I > > orginally installed alsa so that I could play with MIDI stuff in > > Linux, but just

Re: [Xmame] compiling .65

2003-03-04 Thread Benjamin FRANCOIS
On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 13:49:21 -0500 Simon Roby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What C. Ulrich meant here was using OSS emulation with ALSA instead of > the native ALSA API. BTW, ALSA's hardware mixing should work with OSS > emulation too (well, it works on my cs46xx). Oh OK. Well I believe the main

Re: [Xmame] compiling .65

2003-03-04 Thread Simon Roby
Benjamin FRANCOIS wrote: On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 08:43:21 -0500 "C. Ulrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there any advantage to using the alsa ouput over instead of OSS? I orginally installed alsa so that I could play with MIDI stuff in Linux, but just about every program I have defaults to OSS for s

Re: [Xmame] compiling .65

2003-03-04 Thread Benjamin FRANCOIS
On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 08:43:21 -0500 "C. Ulrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any advantage to using the alsa ouput over instead of OSS? I > orginally installed alsa so that I could play with MIDI stuff in > Linux, but just about every program I have defaults to OSS for sound > output and h

Re: [Xmame] compiling .65

2003-03-04 Thread C. Ulrich
Benjamin FRANCOIS wrote: > By the way, I'm having trouble when I try to use Alsa as the audio > driver > with xmame since 1 or 2 versions. The emulation hangs when trying to > initialize the Alsa driver. It used to work in the past with exactly the > same settings. I might have missed some changes,

Re: [Xmame] compiling .65

2003-03-04 Thread Andrea Vettorello
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 21:43, Simon Roby wrote: > Detrick Merz wrote: > > I'm intending to build a live CD containing a light linux install with > > X, and xmame, and about 500M of roms. I'm using Mandrake, cause it's > > easy to install, and easy to control the install enough to get things up > >

Re: [Xmame] compiling .65

2003-03-03 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 04:32:41PM -0500, Simon Roby wrote: > > I'd like to add that I have some problems with the Alsa 0.9 driver too, > in the form of noticeable sound latency issues (but not with the OSS emu > which works fine, so I never bothered to report it). I usually don't > have any on

Re: [Xmame] compiling .65

2003-03-03 Thread Simon Roby
Benjamin FRANCOIS wrote: On Mon, 03 Mar 2003 15:15:41 -0500 Detrick Merz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm intending to build a live CD containing a light linux install with X, and xmame, and about 500M of roms. I'm using Mandrake, cause it's easy to install, and easy to control the install enough t

Re: [Xmame] compiling .65

2003-03-03 Thread Benjamin FRANCOIS
On Mon, 03 Mar 2003 15:15:41 -0500 Detrick Merz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm intending to build a live CD containing a light linux install with > X, and xmame, and about 500M of roms. I'm using Mandrake, cause it's > easy to install, and easy to control the install enough to get things > up q

Re: [Xmame] compiling .65

2003-03-03 Thread Simon Roby
Detrick Merz wrote: I'm intending to build a live CD containing a light linux install with X, and xmame, and about 500M of roms. I'm using Mandrake, cause it's easy to install, and easy to control the install enough to get things up quickly, with an installed system base of around 150M. Anyway..

Re: [Xmame] compiling .65

2003-03-03 Thread David Heremans
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:15:41PM -0500, Detrick Merz wrote: > > Any help as to what I should try/do next? Maybe try a slack distro, and > get that really thin? (I'm trying to keep everything near or under > 150M, so I have room for the roms). > Maybe you could try advanceCD ? AdvanceCD is a b

[Xmame] compiling .65

2003-03-03 Thread Detrick Merz
I'm intending to build a live CD containing a light linux install with X, and xmame, and about 500M of roms. I'm using Mandrake, cause it's easy to install, and easy to control the install enough to get things up quickly, with an installed system base of around 150M. Anyway.. on to my troubles.