Hi,
I was running some benchmarks on xmame 0.65 when I noticed that Xv mode is up
to three times as slow as DGA/fullscreen.
./xmame.x11 puckman -nothrottle -ftr 5000 -noartwork -norotate -noxv -x11-mode
1
Average FPS: 597.744852 (5000 frames)
/xmame.x11 puckman -nothrottle -ftr 5000 -noartwork
XulChris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was running some benchmarks on xmame 0.65 when I noticed that Xv mode is up
> to three times as slow as DGA/fullscreen.
>
> ./xmame.x11 puckman -nothrottle -ftr 5000 -noartwork -norotate -noxv -x11-mode
> 1
> Average FPS: 597.744852 (5000 frames)
>
> /xmame.x11 puck
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:22 am, C. Ulrich wrote:
> BTW, you might try the nvidia binary drivers... Some have said that they
> give a significant 2D performance boost. I don't know if that's true or
> not, but I use them on my machine and haven't had a single problem since
> the 1.0 series w
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 12:40:44 -0800
XulChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ya, I plan to, only problem is that Im using the latest and greatest
> redhat beta and the nvidia kernel module doesnt compile with gcc3, and
> I cant use gcc296 either because the kernel is compiled in gcc3. So
> for now I
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 12:45 pm, Benjamin FRANCOIS wrote:
> NVidia kernel module compiles perfectly here with gcc-3.2. Sure the
> problem doesn't come from elsewhere ?
possible, here is the error I get:
In file included from /lib/modules/2.4.20-2.21/build/include/linux/mm.h:22,
