Re: [xml] Change in HTML "embed" handling breaks parser in 2.6.29+

On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 11:55:03AM +0100, Stefan Behnel wrote: > > Stefan Behnel wrote: > > I noticed a problem with the new way libxml2 2.6.29+ handles the HTML > > "embed" > > tag. It serialises it without the enclosing tag, which then lets following > > attempts to parse the document fail, as

Re: [xml] Regarding xmlTextReaderNext Api: PATCH

On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 03:08:59PM +0800, Ashwin wrote: > > > > ah, then it's a bug. i have tried to make sure the reader and the > walker > > > work the same, but i think I didn't tried that extensively for extra > > > functionality like skipping part of the tree. > > > Can you see why xmlTextR

Re: [xml] Query Regarding Buffer allocation scheme in Libxml

On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 06:04:43PM +0800, Ashwin wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > An intermediate approach could have > > been to start parsing directly from an immutable buffer based on the input > > string and just switch to a small normal buffer when getting to the end of > > the input. But in a

Re: [xml] how to not save

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 08:12:49PM +0100, Martin (gzlist) wrote: > On 25/08/2008, Boz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2008/8/25 Steven 黄 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > I am a xml beginnner, and I am using libxml2 to edit some data for a > > > system > > > configuration file which doesn't contain (

Re: [xml] Cleaning the Web - Implementing HTML 5 parsing in libxml2

Le 20 août 2008 à 23:34, Andi Sidwell a écrit : FWIW, I've spent the summer working on a C HTML5 parser which is approaching stability, called Hubbub[1]. It's about as half as fast as libxml2 at parsing the HTML 5 spec with an O(1) treebuilder, and it's fairly easy to bind to the libxml2 int

Re: [xml] Security fix for libxml2

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 09:47:32PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:51:59AM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:15:41AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 07:00:51PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > > > Bad news, when checking a

Re: [xml] Security fix for libxml2

On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:51:59AM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:15:41AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 07:00:51PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > > Bad news, when checking against recursive entities expansion problem > > > back when it was ma

Re: [xml] how to not save

On 25/08/2008, Boz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/8/25 Steven 黄 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I am a xml beginnner, and I am using libxml2 to edit some data for a system > > configuration file which doesn't contain (all elements > > in this xml are quite standard). Even Though adding this tag to

Re: [xml] Set Default Namespace

On 25/08/2008, Niels Van Hoef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I tried you suggestion even before posting this question but a small > test program yields the following results: > > > > element > This looks like you've passed a pointer to an empty string, rather than a null pointer. > Whe

Re: [xml] how to not save

2008/8/25 Steven 黄 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I am a xml beginnner, and I am using libxml2 to edit some data for a system > configuration file which doesn't contain (all elements > in this xml are quite standard). Even Though adding this tag to the file has > no effect on anything, I still don't like t

[xml] how to not save

I am a xml beginnner, and I am using libxml2 to edit some data for a system configuration file which doesn't contain (all elements in this xml are quite standard). Even Though adding this tag to the file has no effect on anything, I still don't like to add it. Currently I do this: xmlparsef

[xml] [PATCH] Duplicate resolution of CharRefs in regexp (XML Schema)

Under certain circumstances a CharRef is resolved twice which leads to a wrong interpretation of some regular expressions in XML Schemas. The attached patch fixes this bug by removing some superfluous code and adding appropriate unit tests. In addition to this patch, you need to create two empty f

[xml] [PATCH] small typo in an libxml2 error message

I found a small typo in an libxml2 error message. It is fixed by the attached patch. More details: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=542634 Greets, Volker -- Volker Grabsch ---<<(())>>--- Administrator NotJustHosting GbR http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=542634 Index: li

Re: [xml] Set Default Namespace

Hi Martin, Thanks for the replay and the note about setting the namespace for the root node. This was another porblem I was having. I tried you suggestion even before posting this question but a small test program yields the following results: element Where as I would suspect: element