Re: [xml] queer usage of install-sh

2009-10-21 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:36:38PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote: > Yup that refreshes them, I commited the 3 updates. Now the question > is : > - should those files provided by auto* be in git ? > + in a sense they are part of what makes a release > + but they are somehow generated as c

Re: [xml] Build failure on Sparc solaris using gcc and binutils

2009-10-21 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:26:27AM +0300, Roumen Petrov wrote: > Matthias Jung wrote: > [SNIP] >> My suggestion as long -M ld option is not clear ;-) >> >> VERSION_SCRIPT_FLAGS= >> $($LD --help 2>&1 | grep -- --version-script >/dev/null) && \ >>VERSION_SCRIPT_FLAGS=-Wl,--version-script= > > > M

Re: [xml] queer usage of install-sh

2009-10-21 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:10:29AM +0300, Roumen Petrov wrote: > Hi All, Hi Roumen, - I have a pending patch from you, I need to review it, I know :-) - > Daniel Veillard wrote: >> this call to install.sh is generated ! See >> include/libxml/Makefile.am >> the source just lists the head

Re: [xml] Build failure on Sparc solaris using gcc and binutils

2009-10-21 Thread Roumen Petrov
Matthias Jung wrote: [SNIP] My suggestion as long -M ld option is not clear ;-) VERSION_SCRIPT_FLAGS= $($LD --help 2>&1 | grep -- --version-script >/dev/null) && \ VERSION_SCRIPT_FLAGS=-Wl,--version-script= May be is time project to upgrade libtool to 2.+ version where exist flag with_gnu

Re: [xml] queer usage of install-sh

2009-10-21 Thread Roumen Petrov
Hi All, Daniel Veillard wrote: On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:41:37AM +0200, Matthias Jung wrote: Hi all, libxml comes with an 'install-sh' script which seems to be used when good old 'install' is missing on a system. (I know you need a strange system setup to run into this. Or in my case not h

Re: [xml] queer usage of install-sh

2009-10-21 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:41:37AM +0200, Matthias Jung wrote: > Hi all, > libxml comes with an 'install-sh' script which seems to be used when > good old 'install' is missing on a system. > (I know you need a strange system setup to run into this. Or in my case > not having /usr/local/bin, whi

Re: [xml] relative uri

2009-10-21 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 04:51:58PM +0200, François Delyon wrote: > Hi all, > > I have some remarks about the implementation of xmlBuildRelativeURI in > uri.c (libxml 2.7.3) > > 1-critical bug > line 2371 > if ((ref->path[pos] == '.') && (ref->path[pos+1] == '/')) > pos += 2; >

[xml] queer usage of install-sh

2009-10-21 Thread Matthias Jung
Hi all, libxml comes with an 'install-sh' script which seems to be used when good old 'install' is missing on a system. (I know you need a strange system setup to run into this. Or in my case not having /usr/local/bin, which contains install, in PATH) libxml uses install-sh in the same way as

Re: [xml] Build failure on Sparc solaris using gcc and binutils

2009-10-21 Thread Matthias Jung
I looked a bit deeper into details and ask myself whether the check for Solaris and static usage of -M option is a good idea at all. If a linker supports option --version-script it should be used no matter which operating system is in use. First of all I suggest to change the line: $(/usr/bin