According to: http://validator.w3.org/check
The XML you posted is valid.
I also checked it in IE, no error.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Viallard [mailto:a...@patatrac.info]
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 5:57 AM
To: xml@gnome.org
Subject: [xml] xmllint simple validation fail
Hello e
Hello,
I looked through the code, and it seems xsltproc calls xmlReadFile on
XML file, which would load it into memory.
We normally deal with very large XML files and avoid loading them into
memory in our application by using SAX api. However in scripts we call
xsltproc.
Am I understandin
Hello,
I'm aware that xml is case sensitive, but is there a switch to turn that
off?
Of course we can just convert the file into lowercase/uppercase before
setting libxml2 on it, but if there's an option, I'd rather not.
Thanks.
Alex
___
xml
Just wanted to know if there are any comments regarding the patch.
Is it ok to copy data from result->nodesetval->nodeTab[i]->children->content
instead of using function xmlNodeListGetString?
The reason for not using xmlNodeListGetString, is in case of query such as
/hello/world/text(), the fun
Hello,
I think I have found an issue in this tutorial: http://xmlsoft.org/tutorial/apd.html
I am providing a patch (xpath.c.patch), but not sure if you’ll
agree with it.
The call to function xmlNodeListGetString has been removed,
and now there is a lookup for the value directly
Hi, sorry if the topic doesn’t belong here, I cannot
locate any other place to ask the question.
Please let me know if xslproc can process XSLT 2.0.
I found this quote on http://www.xmlsoft.org/XSLT.html: A
separate library called libxslt is available implementing XSLT-1.0 for libxm
If you are more interested in creating the output than learning to code
with libxml2, you may want to use xslt to convert your input XML
document into your desired output.
Xsltproc is one of executables you can use for such transformations:
http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/xsltproc.html
> -Original Mes
Hi,
We had problems purifying applications using libxml2 as well.
The issue occurred on Solaris and Windows (those are the only platforms
we have purify on).
The issue only occurred when using dynamic libxml2 library
(libxml2.so/libxml2.dll). When we statically linked to libxml2
(libxml2.a), the
'ar' is not in your path. There was another email about this yesterday,
and we too had the problem here, until we saw responses to email and put
'ar' in path (you will have to re-run configure as well).
I would personally prefer if commands were not replaced with 'false'
command.
> -Original
Hi,
Is there a way to get a char * value of xmlParserErrors enum?
For example, you can use a function strerror to get value of errno in
char * format, does anything like that exist for xmlParserErrors?
Thank you.
Alex
___
xm
I don't think it's an xml problem, I think it's a printf issue.
Instead of: printf(bufptr);
Use: printf("%s", bufptr);
Since your bufptr contains % characters, the characters after it have
special meanings. For example %d means print integer, %s means print
string ... this is standard C stuff.
Hi,
I cannot figure out how to use xPath without loading the entire XML into
memory.
Let me start of by saying that the document is stored in a proprietary
format, so I have to use our functions to read the data from the files.
I would like to use xPath without having to load entire XML into memo
12 matches
Mail list logo