On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 09:26 -0400, Webb Scales wrote:
> Is it possible that the error message is wrong?
Like most parsers, if given faulty input the output is sometimes
unexpected.
I'm not a maintainer here, but i'd guess that a patch to detect the
case of the document having no XML elements in
Thank you for being so patient with me!
I did look at the XML grammar, but I only got far enough to suggest that
the prolog was optional. I should have continued on, but I was confused
by the error message from LibXML2 ("Extra content at the end of the
document") which seemed to indicate that
On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 00:47 -0400, Webb Scales wrote:
> Would a file containing just an XML comment, e.g.,
>
>
>
>
> be an acceptable input to LibXML2?
Let's look at the specification of XML,
https://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/
We see in section 2.1,
[[
[Definition: A textual object is a well-fo
Would a file containing just an XML comment, e.g.,
be an acceptable input to LibXML2?
In my particular case, it's reacting with "Extra content at the end of
the document", and I'm trying to determine whether it is due to some
other factor in my specific scenario.
Thanks!
