On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:06:51PM +0100, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry to be late to the party. Let me note that the release tests fine with
> lxml, just with two test failures due to changed (and apparently more
> accurate) error texts/IDs. I'll adapt the tests in lxml.
>
> Thank you for
Hi,
sorry to be late to the party. Let me note that the release tests fine with
lxml, just with two test failures due to changed (and apparently more
accurate) error texts/IDs. I'll adapt the tests in lxml.
Thank you for the release, Daniel!
Stefan
Daniel Veillard schrieb am 28.10.19 um 21:26
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:40:34AM +1300, David Warring wrote:
> The tests for newish Raku (Perl 6) bindings are fine with libxml2-2.9.10-rc1
> https://github.com/p6-xml/LibXML-p6
Okay seems we have a good one ! Thanks David
BTW is lxml current maintainer around, that may be one good way to val
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 02:07:28PM -0400, Mike Dalessio wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just FYI - the Nokogiri (Ruby gem wrapping libxml2) test pipelines are all
> *green* with 2.9.10-rc1.
>
> See
> https://ci.nokogiri.org/teams/nokogiri-core/pipelines/nokogiri-libxml-2.9.10
> for
> details, but RC1 looks
The tests for newish Raku (Perl 6) bindings are fine with libxml2-2.9.10-rc1
https://github.com/p6-xml/LibXML-p6
- David
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 5:53 AM Daniel Veillard via xml
wrote:
> Took a while but it's time to assemble a new release,
> I tagged it in git and pushed signed tarball and rp
Hi all,
Just FYI - the Nokogiri (Ruby gem wrapping libxml2) test pipelines are all
*green* with 2.9.10-rc1.
See
https://ci.nokogiri.org/teams/nokogiri-core/pipelines/nokogiri-libxml-2.9.10
for
details, but RC1 looks good from here.
-m
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:12 AM Daniel Veillard via xml
w
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 02:35:06PM +0100, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28.10.2019 at 10:06, Daniel Veillard via xml wrote:
>
> > In the absence of feedback or changes since RC1, I am not pushing
> > an RC2 for libxml2-2.9.10, assume a final release for Wed or Thursday,
> >
> > in t
Hi,
On 28.10.2019 at 10:06, Daniel Veillard via xml wrote:
> In the absence of feedback or changes since RC1, I am not pushing
> an RC2 for libxml2-2.9.10, assume a final release for Wed or Thursday,
>
> in the meantime, please give it a try !
I just ran the php-src test suite for all releva
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 06:53:07PM +0200, Daniel Veillard via xml wrote:
> Took a while but it's time to assemble a new release,
> I tagged it in git and pushed signed tarball and rpms to the
> usual place:
>
>ftp://xmlsoft.org/libxml2/
>
> I will try to make an rc2 during the week-end, and
Took a while but it's time to assemble a new release,
I tagged it in git and pushed signed tarball and rpms to the
usual place:
ftp://xmlsoft.org/libxml2/
I will try to make an rc2 during the week-end, and then we can
roll up the release by mid next week.
In the meantime please give it som
10 matches
Mail list logo
