On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 03:08:59PM +0800, Ashwin wrote:
>
> > > ah, then it's a bug. i have tried to make sure the reader and the
> walker
> > > work the same, but i think I didn't tried that extensively for extra
> > > functionality like skipping part of the tree.
> > > Can you see why xmlTextR
> > ah, then it's a bug. i have tried to make sure the reader and the
walker
> > work the same, but i think I didn't tried that extensively for extra
> > functionality like skipping part of the tree.
> > Can you see why xmlTextReaderNextTree doesn't work, it seems it should
> > do what is expect
