Re: [xml] Continuous integration for libxml2?

2015-10-29 Thread David Drysdale
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Nick Wellnhofer wrote: > On 21/10/2015 09:11, David Drysdale wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Daniel Veillard >> wrote: >> >>>The biggest issue I have is non-linux, I never use Windows or Macs >>> and I

Re: [xml] Continuous integration for libxml2?

2015-10-21 Thread David Drysdale
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 02:06:30PM +0100, David Drysdale wrote: >> Hi folks, > > Hi David, > >> Does libxml2 have a continuous integration system running over it somewhere? > > Not that I know of :) > TBH the rate

Re: [xml] Continuous integration for libxml2?

2015-10-21 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 08:11:47AM +0100, David Drysdale wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 02:06:30PM +0100, David Drysdale wrote: > >> Hi folks, > > > > Hi David, > > > >> Does libxml2 have a continuous integration

Re: [xml] Continuous integration for libxml2?

2015-10-21 Thread David Drysdale
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 08:11:47AM +0100, David Drysdale wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote: >> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 02:06:30PM +0100, David Drysdale wrote: >>

Re: [xml] Continuous integration for libxml2?

2015-10-16 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 02:06:30PM +0100, David Drysdale wrote: > Hi folks, Hi David, > Does libxml2 have a continuous integration system running over it somewhere? Not that I know of :) TBH the rate of changes is fairly slow, i.e. the code is mature (some will call it overripe even !) and