Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> Think I'm giving you a hard time? You should probably hope that no one
> in the W3C decides to take your list too seriously.
as everyone should have noticed by now, XML is all about lording your
XMLiness over others. that's not very Pythonic, of course, and, like or
not, th
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 17:54 +0200, Ken Beesley wrote:
> Uche Ogbuji wrote
>
> >--
> >
> >Message: 2
> >Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:59:09 -0600
> >From: Uche Ogbuji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: [XML-SIG] Corrected l
Uche Ogbuji wrote
>--
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:59:09 -0600
>From: Uche Ogbuji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [XML-SIG] Corrected list of packages handling XML 1.1
>To: Walter D?rwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: xml
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 12:50 +0200, Walter Dörwald wrote:
> Ken Beesley wrote:
>
> > My apologies to Fredrik Lundh of Pythonware for the omission of
> > ElementType+sgmlop in my recent listing of Python-XML packages that
> > handle XML 1.1. The list (that I'm aware of) currently includes: 1.
> >
Ken Beesley wrote:
> My apologies to Fredrik Lundh of Pythonware for the omission of
> ElementType+sgmlop in my recent listing of Python-XML packages that
> handle XML 1.1. The list (that I'm aware of) currently includes: 1.
> pxdom by Andrew Clover (http://www.doxdesk.com/software/py/pxdom.htm
My apologies to Fredrik Lundh of Pythonware for the omission of
ElementType+sgmlop in my recent listing of Python-XML packages that
handle XML 1.1. The list (that I'm aware of) currently includes: 1.
pxdom by Andrew Clover (http://www.doxdesk.com/software/py/pxdom.html,
http://www.doxdesk.com/f
