Re: [xmlblaster] Xindice support in 0.8?

2002-09-29 Thread Adam Williams
>>Is the 0.8 release capable of using Xindice as the message store or does >>one still need HEAD for that? >Actually there should not be a difference to earlier releases. >Since I don't know how this performs in real live, I would consider this >driver still not 100% reliable because I still have

Re: [xmlblaster] Xindice support in 0.8?

2002-09-29 Thread Heinrich Götzger
On 29 Sep 2002, Adam Williams wrote: >Is the 0.8 release capable of using Xindice as the message store or does >one still need HEAD for that? > Actually there should not be a difference to earlier releases. Since I don't know how this performs in real live, I would consider this driver still not

[xmlblaster] Xindice support in 0.8?

2002-09-29 Thread Adam Williams
Is the 0.8 release capable of using Xindice as the message store or does one still need HEAD for that? -- This message undoubtedly processed by the purely benevolent "US Department of Homeland Security", but don't worry... they'r