Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: [xmlblaster] Question on pausing the updatemethod long enough to process messages...

2002-11-29 Thread Heinrich Götzger
Kelli, > I actually thought about splitting the processing up. My concern was that > after the messages in the queue were subscribed to once, I didn't want them > to be subscribed to again. I thought that if I set the initial update to > FALSE, that I would only be able to subscribe to new message

Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: [xmlblaster] Question on pausing the updatemethod long enough to process messages...

2002-11-29 Thread Heinrich Götzger
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.4 June 8, 2000 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Kelli Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 22:16:09 -0500 > X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CACIMTA/CACI(Release 5.0.10 |March 22, 2002) at >11/28/2002 > 10:1