t all in vain.
Regards,
Fahad
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/embedding-a-string-into-structure-XML-RPC-request-tp16001079p16001079.html
Sent from the Apache Xml-RPC - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:56 AM, fahad.aizaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> originNodeTypeTEST
[...]
> originNodeTypeTEST
[...]
> The tag is missing from the output xml data above.
The XML-RPC spec specifies the absence of any type indicator as
equivalent with the use of the "string" in
hen
>
>
>
> --
> Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
> you break 'em.
>
> -- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
>
> -------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional comm
umentation available that describes the fucntionality of
these classes.
regards,
Fahad
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/embedding-a-string-into-structure-XML-RPC-request-tp16001079p16024127.html
Sent from the Apache Xml-RPC - Dev mailing list archive at
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:41 AM, fahad.aizaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> public TypeParser getParser(XmlRpcStreamConfig pConfig, NamespaceContextImpl
You don't need to create a custom parser. The serializer is sufficient
in your case. Btw, it would be nice if you could create an entry on
http:
s the fucntionality of
> these classes.
>
> regards,
>
> Fahad
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/embedding-a-string-into-structure-XML-RPC-request-tp16001079p17105606.html
Sent from the Apache Xml-RPC - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
