Re: [xmlsec] enhancement to xmlsec

2002-12-21 Thread Aleksey Sanin
- From: Aleksey Sanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:57 AM To: Moultrie, Ferrell (ISSAtlanta) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [xmlsec] enhancement to xmlsec Thanks a lot! I just know that any non trivial knowledge (like "starting from slash...") mig

RE: [xmlsec] enhancement to xmlsec

2002-12-19 Thread Moultrie, Ferrell (ISSAtlanta)
nta) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [xmlsec] enhancement to xmlsec Thanks a lot! I just know that any non trivial knowledge (like "starting from slash...") might be lost other the time :) The only problem I have is that I don't see attachment :) Can you resend it, please? Thanks

Re: [xmlsec] enhancement to xmlsec

2002-12-19 Thread Aleksey Sanin
Thanks a lot! I just know that any non trivial knowledge (like "starting from slash...") might be lost other the time :) The only problem I have is that I don't see attachment :) Can you resend it, please? Thanks, Aleksey Moultrie, Ferrell (ISSAtlanta) wrote: Aleksey: Done. I didn't think t

RE: [xmlsec] enhancement to xmlsec

2002-12-19 Thread Moultrie, Ferrell (ISSAtlanta)
nta) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [xmlsec] enhancement to xmlsec Hi, Ferrell! I like this idea but might I propose to add a new argument "--node-xpath" instead of changing the meaning of the old one? I just don't like this tricky "if argument starts with slash..."

Re: [xmlsec] enhancement to xmlsec

2002-12-19 Thread Aleksey Sanin
Hi, Ferrell! I like this idea but might I propose to add a new argument "--node-xpath" instead of changing the meaning of the old one? I just don't like this tricky "if argument starts with slash..." part because I 'll be the first one who will forget about this :) Will you mind to make this cha