Sébastien Cevey wrote:
Today I realized my error, but thought, why don't I just do the same for
arguments?
[...]
* automatic vararg support
OTOH we already have optional arguments.
At the expense of some extra lines of service client code and extra
information to the arg_type_add call.
At Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:33:14 -0400, Daniel Chokola wrote:
> While making it, I forgot that service clients allow multiple return
> values, so I assumed there was only one return value like in C
> functions, and made a return value an implicit value_t.
IIRC it was the case because at that time, we
Hello folks,
I've got a draft specification of the service clients API that I banged
out in Ruby yesterday. [1][2] While making it, I forgot that service
clients allow multiple return values, so I assumed there was only one
return value like in C functions, and made a return value an implicit
Anders Waldenborg wrote:
(btw, I like saying SP, because then we can change the name to Source
Policy without anyone noticing)
I like that, too. ;)
My plan is as follows:
1) Move sourcepref to serverside and make mediainfo_get return plain dict
2) Nothing uses propdict anymore, remove it.
Selon Sebastien Cevey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I suggest that until SP is done server-side, mediainfo_get already returns a
> dict-in-dict instead of the current propdict.
>
> (or alternatively, mediainfo_getfull and mediainfo_get returns some dict
> approximation of the SP-filtered propdict.)
cla
Selon Anders Waldenborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I agree with everything Anders said, just a note:
> My plan is as follows:
>
> 1) Move sourcepref to serverside and make mediainfo_get return plain dict
That's a job for nesciens' coll2.0 project, actually.
And I don't think we need to wait for that
Daniel Chokola wrote:
Hello list!
So, I was involved in a discussion with theefer and anders_ on IRC the
other day about propdicts and source preference. Two issues arose and I
didn't really understand the consensus on either of them. So I'll ask
again on the mailing list so perhaps someone h
Hello list!
So, I was involved in a discussion with theefer and anders_ on IRC the
other day about propdicts and source preference. Two issues arose and I
didn't really understand the consensus on either of them. So I'll ask
again on the mailing list so perhaps someone has the time to write a
At Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:34:22 -0400, Daniel Chokola wrote:
> But supposedly dicts and propdicts merge if we move source preference to
> the client side.
*server* side.
> I really wish someone would show me an example, because I'm not
> understanding how this works. :(
medialib_set_source_pref
