> As mentioned by others, there's a roadmap on the Mantis, but we should
> try to maintain a DR page in advance, like we did for previous
> releases iirc? tru?
>
> We also decided to write down better descriptions of the projets that
> are cooking, so people can easily learn about them.
>
Yeah, t
Hello,
In order to be more transparent and all, what do you think about
voting for features in XMMS2? drax pointed me towards uservoice.com,
which is free for open source projects. You can see a example here:
http://tweetdeck.uservoice.com/
I think it could be a cool idea if we link it to our man
Selon Tobias Rundström :
> What do you all think?
I think that for the general XMMS2 development, a benevolent dictator (or two?)
is the best way to go, possibly accompanied/challenged by a group of core devs.
The development of major internal features is subject to too many constraints
(who can
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:07, Sebastien Cevey wrote:
> Selon Tobias Rundström :
>
>> What do you all think?
>
> On the other hand, I believe it'd be a great approach to get user feedback and
> learn more about their wishes for things like new clients (even nycli, or the
> future GUI). It's dynami
Hi,
I am working on a plugin to upmix two channel stereo to 5.1. In order
for it to be usable, I would like to add proper multichannel support
to the core, but I have some questions about how it should be done.
First, it seems that when effects are added to the chain they are not
checked against t
