At Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:23:28 -0400, Daniel Chokola wrote:
> I have r/v split stuff in my build branch (which, surprise, is what
> i build!) for testing. I'll throw SC on top of it soon.
Cool! Try to see how we can profit from the new value_t to improve
the API, esp. wrt service arguments, etc.
Daniel Svensson wrote:
RV split will happen in -devel after release, there exists a working
branch in theefers tree, go rebase SC on top of it!
Visualization works well according to anders, both with shm under
Linux, and udp elsewhere, however, its visual appearance is not on par
with the rest o
Daniel Chokola wrote:
If I wasn't so crappy about meetings, maybe I'd have this answer
already, but why isn't visualization or r/v split going into DrLecter?
Is UDP so insanely broken?
We want the release done quick and not a long TEST period. Large changes
are best done early in release cycl
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Daniel Chokola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I wasn't so crappy about meetings, maybe I'd have this answer already,
> but why isn't visualization or r/v split going into DrLecter? Is UDP so
> insanely broken?
RV split will happen in -devel after release, there ex
Anders Waldenborg wrote:
The first TEST (which actually is the TEST2 because of a minor screwup)
release for XMMS2 0.4 DrLecter is out. Please grab it at the usual
places (that means
http://test.xmms.se/source/xmms2-0.4DrKosmos+WIP+TEST2.tar.bz2 and git)
So start your xmms2-et and check http:
The first TEST (which actually is the TEST2 because of a minor screwup)
release for XMMS2 0.4 DrLecter is out. Please grab it at the usual
places (that means
http://test.xmms.se/source/xmms2-0.4DrKosmos+WIP+TEST2.tar.bz2 and git)
So start your xmms2-et and check http://test.xmms.se/ for what
