On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 03:42:50PM +0200, Simon Thum wrote:
> One non-ignoring handler is invoked at max. For this we have to
> differentiate the RC.
> When a handler is invoked, it may decide to call a new function which
> allows it to pass through to handlers AFTER itself. A logical complement
>
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 11:50:40PM +0100, Magnus Kessler wrote:
> This series of patches removes support for the ancient XInput ABI 0.x from
> the synaptics driver, which in turn makes some more cleanup patches
> possible. There seems to be a consensus that supporting XInput ABI older
> than 2.x
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 11:41:27PM +0100, Magnus Kessler wrote:
> The attached patch lets git ignore pkgconfig files.
Thanks, pushed.
Cheers,
Peter
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
This series of patches removes support for the ancient XInput ABI 0.x from
the synaptics driver, which in turn makes some more cleanup patches
possible. There seems to be a consensus that supporting XInput ABI older
than 2.x is not really needed any more [1].
Caveat: do we need some changes to
The attached patch lets git ignore pkgconfig files.
Cheers,
Magnus
Update .gitignore
Ignore pkgconfig .pc files
Signed-off-by: Magnus.Kessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 5867407..1aaf548 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -23,3 +23,4 @@ stamp-h1
sy
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Michel Dänzer
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 19:20 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
O
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Michel Dänzer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 19:20 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Michel Dänzer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 19:20 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > These names are supposedly historical, but everyone seems to use them
>> > for th
> I think you need to build xserver with --disable-builtin-fonts.
Thanks a lot, that worked :)
> /etc/fonts/ is configuration for the fontconfig library, not the X
> server.
Ah, ok.
Thanks, Clemens
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http:/
Ian,
These drivers don't build due to needing TLC for xf86Version.h problems.
Are you still maintaining these? If not, the maintainer's file
presumably should be updated...
Best Regards,
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
One Laptop Per Chi
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 09:38 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 18:59 +0200, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> >
> > I am currently trying to build xorg from git, and it mostly works
> > except some font stuff.
> >
> > When I try to start xterm it quits immediatly with the following messa
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 19:28 -0500, Alex Villacís Lasso wrote:
> Recently I dug up a very old graphics card, an Oak Spitfire OTI-64111 by
> Oak Technologies. After looking up information for it in Google, I found
> that there is no specific driver for xorg (although there are plenty of
> mirrors
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 11:14 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 11:02 +0200, Fabio wrote:
> >
> > I noticed some performance regression moving to a newer system with Xserver
> > 1.5.1 from an 1.4 system with both XAA and EXA.
>
> Can you try current Git server-1.5-branch? Adam Jac
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Michel Dänzer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 18:59 +0200, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
>>
>> I am currently trying to build xorg from git, and it mostly works
>> except some font stuff.
>>
>> When I try to start xterm it quits immediatly with the foll
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 03:54:12PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> You mean commit 4017d3190234e189a0bbd33193a148d4d3c7556b? That's already
> in 1.4.99.901.
No, I meant this one:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=ebea78cdba0ff14a397239ee1936bd254c181e1b
Curriously, I did backporti
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:47 +0200, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 11:41:21AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?h=server-1.5-branch&id=8ef37c194fa08d3911095299413a42a01162b078
>
> Well, doesn't it need also the patch that converts all
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 11:41:21AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?h=server-1.5-branch&id=8ef37c194fa08d3911095299413a42a01162b078
Well, doesn't it need also the patch that converts all DevPrivateKey key=&key;
to static int keyIndex; DevPrivateKey key
Peter Hutterer wrote:
> right now, the properties are documented in the header files that define their
> names. They should eventually be added to the man pages, once they settle down
> a bit.
Fine, I'll be including a header.
> So based on the current implementation (the one that is in master), w
Apologies for not spotting this earlier.
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 08:51:56AM -0700, Aaron Plattner wrote:
> commit 079625570d51e41569b73b2fd9237eb8f967f408
> Author: Aaron Plattner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon Sep 8 08:50:52 2008 -0700
>
> Bump ABI major versions for the TryClientExceptio
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 11:35 +0200, Fabio wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 11:02 +0200, Fabio wrote:
> > >
> > > I noticed some performance regression moving to a newer system with
> > > Xserver
> > > 1.5.1 from an 1.4 system with both XAA and EXA.
> >
> > Can you try current Git server-1.5-branc
> On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 11:02 +0200, Fabio wrote:
> >
> > I noticed some performance regression moving to a newer system with Xserver
> > 1.5.1 from an 1.4 system with both XAA and EXA.
>
> Can you try current Git server-1.5-branch? Adam Jackson just backported
> the reduction of dixLookupPrivat
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 11:02 +0200, Fabio wrote:
>
> I noticed some performance regression moving to a newer system with Xserver
> 1.5.1 from an 1.4 system with both XAA and EXA.
Can you try current Git server-1.5-branch? Adam Jackson just backported
the reduction of dixLookupPrivate() overhead, w
Hi,
I noticed some performance regression moving to a newer system with Xserver
1.5.1 from an 1.4 system with both XAA and EXA.
As a benchmark I am using GtkPerf [0] with "gtkperf -a -c500" without compiz on
a MacBook Pro with a Radeon RV530. While I noticed some improvement going from
1.5 to 1.5.1
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 08:49:57AM +0100, Magnus Kessler wrote:
> what's considered the minimum version of the XInput ABI an input driver
> needs to support these days?
>
> I see lots of #if GET_ABI_MAJOR in the xf86-input-synaptics driver that seem
> to support ancient ABI versions. Is this sti
Hi,
here are a few janitorial patches for the synaptics driver. The patches to
the tools directory eliminate warnings flagged up by sparse. The patch to
the driver code reduces the dependency on the mi code, which only needed to
support an ancient XInput ABI version.
Regards,
Magnus Kessler
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:59:33PM +0200, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:^M
> > Warning: Type "ONE_LEVEL" has 1 levels, but has 2 symbols^M
> > Ignoring extra symbols^M
> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server^M
You
Hi,
what's considered the minimum version of the XInput ABI an input driver
needs to support these days?
I see lots of #if GET_ABI_MAJOR in the xf86-input-synaptics driver that seem
to support ancient ABI versions. Is this still appropriate?
Regards,
Magnus Kessler
signature.asc
Description
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 18:59 +0200, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
>
> I am currently trying to build xorg from git, and it mostly works
> except some font stuff.
>
> When I try to start xterm it quits immediatly with the following messages:
>
> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:^M
> > War
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 19:20 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > These names are supposedly historical, but everyone seems to use them
> > for the same purpose.
> > I am aware this may require a few minor changes to (for ex
29 matches
Mail list logo
