On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 14:37 -0800, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
commit 2db7b66863ae6055c3ce13c88b36d620de8a4d75
Author: Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Dec 19 23:12:37 2008 +0100
exa: a few cleanups
- Some warnings silenced.
- Some whitespace cleanup.
I have a multiseat station with two graphics cards: AGP and PCI.
Lately, I replaced the AGP nvidia - now, the machine is equipped with two ATI
cards:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 AR [Radeon 9600]
01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 AR [Radeon
I can't see any reason why we would treat buttons 5 differently. This
patch simplifies client code by eliminating the need to call XGrabDevice
after a button has been pressed and prevents race conditions that could
result from that.
Tom
From cc4a046ac387bd03c1cba1d017bdc1ced75b44d0 Mon Sep 17
Hello,
I've built the latest master branches mesa, xserver, xf86-video-intel
and the dependencies using the jhbuild tool.
Also, I've tried building drm modules from the modesetting-gem branch,
but i915 module is not compiling there, make is not building it. So
I've tested with the latest
Hmm, I guess 11.1 uses intel-2.5, which has (at leat on my 945GM)
quite a number of performance problems.
Xorg-7.3 (xserver 1.5.x) also has quite a bad performance bug for
dixLookupPrivate which will only be fixed for 1.6 because of API
issues.
If you don't use a xrender-based composition
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
I'm running into this intel driver limit on a i945GM card:
xrandr: screen cannot be larger than 1280x1824 (desired size 1920x1824)
I've recompiled from source from
Dear Greg,
Am Samstag, den 20.12.2008, 20:38 + schrieb Greg Stark:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
I'm running into this intel driver limit on a i945GM card:
xrandr: screen cannot be larger than 1280x1824 (desired size
