Re: Preferred (gentoo) Intel Stack?

2008-12-24 Thread Beso
2008/12/24 Rémi Cardona : > Le 23/12/2008 23:56, Nikos Chantziaras a écrit : >> Why not? I thought the x11-drm from git (that's x11-drm- in the >> x11 overlay) was always the best way to test the latest code... > > Not anymore. Now the drm drivers are developed directly within the linux >

Re: Memory leak in fedora 8 xorg server 1.3

2008-12-24 Thread Barry Scott
Beso wrote: > 2008/12/23 Barry Scott : > >> I have found the leak. >> >> > isn't it simpler to update the xorg-server version?! 1.3 one is rather > old and probably > I'm working on an embedded system which makes it a big problem to update the Xorg server. > a memory leak bug would have

Re: xserver 1.6 branch and mouse position zapping

2008-12-24 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 24/12/08 02:11 did gyre and gimble: > Hi, > > Just built the 1.6 branch + recent mesa snapshot and other such stuff. > > It seems to be stable enough just now, but one thing that's been > affected is how the mouse positions itself to top-left after a certain

Re: Memory leak in fedora 8 xorg server 1.3

2008-12-24 Thread Barry Scott
Barry Scott wrote: > I have found the leak. > > At line 202 in miext/cw/cw_ops.c we have: > Sorry this is not the leak. (I followed the wrong caller of miRegionCreate). The leak is coming from this call sequence: #0 miRegionCreate (rect=0x0, size=0) at miregion.c:339 #1 0x0812ed4b in miRects

Re: Fw: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 6.9.0.91 - release candidate

2008-12-24 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 24 December 2008, Dave Airlie wrote: [...] >> I found the one in xf86-video-radeonhd-1.2.4, and copied it to the src >> tree beside the other .h files, and it built, and I've installed it and >> running it, although not much is changed. glxgears is still moping along >> at about 875

memcpy to AGP vs memcpy to framebuffer - which is faster?

2008-12-24 Thread Alex Villací­s Lasso
This is probably a very basic question, but it is important for me to know: If I do an ordinary (non-accelerated) memcpy of a frame from system memory to a buffer in AGP memory (allocated via DRI), is it any faster than a (non-accelerated) memcpy of the exact same frame to a buffer area in offs

More Displaylink stuff

2008-12-24 Thread Florian Echtler
Hello everyone, I fiddled around a bit more with my Displaylink device, and here's what I found so far (posted as a sort of reference, and maybe to help start a discussion): Content of transfers: - All image data is sent as bulk transfers. - The driver sends two big blocks during the setup pha

Re: More Displaylink stuff

2008-12-24 Thread Alan Cox
> - The key is likely 16 bytes, which are sent as a control transfer. They > appear > to be random, but the same 16-byte string can appear repeatedly, esp. if the > device is initialized immediately after bootup. If these 16 bytes are equal, > then all bulk transfers are also identical byte-for-

Re: Fw: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 6.9.0.91 - release candidate

2008-12-24 Thread Timo Jyrinki
2008/12/24 Gene Heskett : >>> But now this exposes a new problem I don't recall in these exact words, >>> when I do a startx, it cannot load the kernel radeon module >>> (this from the Xorg.0.log) > > Any comment on this? ... > for the health & well being of an HD2400-Pro (rv610) card? The direct

Re: More Displaylink stuff

2008-12-24 Thread Florian Echtler
Hello Alan, >> - The key is likely 16 bytes, which are sent as a control transfer. They >> appear >> to be random, but the same 16-byte string can appear repeatedly, esp. if the >> device is initialized immediately after bootup. If these 16 bytes are equal, >> then all bulk transfers are also ide

Re: More Displaylink stuff

2008-12-24 Thread Alan Cox
> so are the subsequent image blocks. However, when I change the background > image and reboot the VM, I can get the same "key" at startup, but > different image blocks. So I'm quite sure it can't be any kind of hash. So both encrypted VNC or RDP variants are candidates. It doesn't sound like VN

Re: Patch for use of RT_NONE busted by an update to resource.c

2008-12-24 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 15:30:09 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 14:25 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > Hi All: > > > > What would it take to include the attached patch for dixfonts.c? > > Uh, you've uncovered a serious bug in DIX. The XSELinux patches tried to > automatically

Re: xserver 1.6 branch and mouse position zapping

2008-12-24 Thread Brian Rogers
Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 24/12/08 02:11 did gyre and gimble: > >> Hi, >> >> Just built the 1.6 branch + recent mesa snapshot and other such stuff. >> >> It seems to be stable enough just now, but one thing that's been >> affected is how the mouse positions itse

about continuous frequency

2008-12-24 Thread Ma, Ling
hi Alex, Because the flag exist in EDID, but some laptop can't provide EDID, how can we know whether it support continuous frequency or not ? Thanks Ma Ling ___ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/x