On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 17:34 -0800, Bipin George Mathew wrote:
(1) What if I do not use DRI and explicitly use indirect rendering on
Intel. I tried exporting the LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT=1, but the initial
issue persisted.
That's AIGLX, which also uses the DRI, so this is expected.
(2) When
2009/1/13 sdrb s...@onet.eu:
John Tapsell wrote:
2009/1/13 sdrb s...@onet.eu:
Hi,
I have a question regarding switching from X-Window to virtual terminal.
Usually I use both of them and I very often switch between of them.
The switching process usually takes 3-8 seconds (X11 - VT).
I
On 2009.01.13 15:59:43 +0800, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:59:06 +0800, Wang, Zhenyu Z wrote:
[...]
Could you try 'intel-2008-q4' branch in mesa?
No difference in glxgears. I didn't test googleearth and quake3 because
I don't want to reboot right now.
Forget to
Hi Bill,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 05:25:45PM +0200, Bill Wittig wrote:
The xorg-server version is 1.5.3. I can't check specifically for the
patch you referenced until tonight - perhaps you know if it's included
in the released 1.5.3.
objdump -T /opt/X2/bin/Xorg | grep xf86MonitorIsHDMI
John Tapsell wrote:
2009/1/13 sdrb s...@onet.eu:
John Tapsell wrote:
2009/1/13 sdrb s...@onet.eu:
Hi,
I have a question regarding switching from X-Window to virtual terminal.
Usually I use both of them and I very often switch between of them.
The switching process usually takes 3-8 seconds
Tino Keitel wrote on Friday, January 09, 2009 3:45 AM:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 16:04:55 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.5.99.2
I'd like to know how/what can/should be tested before the release.
What versions of kernel/xserver/mesa/drm/whatever are required?
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
p...@mandriva.com.br wrote:
Thanks. For simplicity, I feel tempted to remove:
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(APPDEFS, xt)
appdefaultdir=$(pkg-config --variable=appdefaultdir xt)
First, thanks for the comments.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:09:22PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 16:46 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
An XDeviceHierarchyChangedEvent is sent whenever the device hierarchy
has
been changed by either the client, or by
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Peter Hutterer
peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 04:45:16PM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
With the current rules, the man pages will be generated repeatedly if you
have xmlto installed. This is because make always thinks they are out of
date
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 17:26 +0800, Jin, Gordon wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:45 AM:
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 01:55 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Testing git HEAD intel drivers, also recent Xorg:
After the problem with miss-detected TV-out, I killed Xorg with a
This didn't send first time
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 01:55 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Testing git HEAD intel drivers, also recent Xorg:
After the problem with miss-detected TV-out, I killed Xorg with a Ctrl
+Alt+Backspace (I've got zapping re-enabled in my xorg.conf), and the
outputs
This didn't send first time...
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 01:55 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Trying xrandr, adjusting brightness, had no effect. A couple of VT
switches to VT1 and back to Xorg finally stopped the detection loop,
although during that process, one of the the switches to VT1 left me
With the latest git for xserver and the latest git for savage, an
attempt to start up crashes the server unless this patch is applied. It
seems that an explicit xf86CrtcConfigInit() is now required in the
PreInit stage of the driver setup. I found via valgrind that the absence
of this call
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 22:37 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
The idea here was to be able to filter easily. I expect that many clients
won't care much about reattachment, but they would care about new MDs.
Having this information may prove useful. As for the deviceids - same idea.
I guess this
Dave Airlie wrote:
Should I file a bug in the bugzilla? Is this even the right place to
ask? If not, then I would be happy to get a pointer in the right direction.
please file a bug in bugzilla against xorg, Driver/radeon (or maybe
ati), attach xorg log from 6.9.0 and new driver if possible.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Alex Villacís Lasso
a_villa...@palosanto.com wrote:
With the latest git for xserver and the latest git for savage, an attempt to
start up crashes the server unless this patch is applied. It seems that an
explicit xf86CrtcConfigInit() is now required in the
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 12:28 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
These just all happen to be drivers with xrandr 1.2 support.
Something changed in the xserver that breaks non xrandr 1.2 drivers.
You should probably file a bug (https://bugs.freedesktop.org) and make
sure this gets fixed before xserver
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 09:08 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:58 am Peter Clifton wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 17:26 +0800, Jin, Gordon wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:45 AM:
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 01:55 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Alex Deucher escribió:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Alex Villacís Lasso
a_villa...@palosanto.com wrote:
With the latest git for xserver and the latest git for savage, an attempt to
start up crashes the server unless this patch is applied. It seems that an
explicit
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 17:24:10 +0800, Jin, Gordon wrote:
[...]
Please let me know if any questions.
Thanks for the information. However, still no luck.
xorg-intel: 2.5.99.2
kernel: e1a6fcee467556a7e955fe1f7ccc134dd2f974e7 from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/anholt/drm-intel,
Hi Dan,
could you please recheck your latest commit
9911b7846ca2cedf08a963c84efe7907438975c1? Obviously being too smart
does not help in this case... ;)
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/engel/software/Xorg/lib/libXi/man'
make[1]: *** No rule
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Johannes Engel jcnen...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
could you please recheck your latest commit
9911b7846ca2cedf08a963c84efe7907438975c1? Obviously being too smart
does not help in this case... ;)
make[1]: Entering directory
I just tried with the drm-intel-2.6.28 branch
e1a6fcee467556a7e955fe1f7ccc134dd2f974e7 (2.6.28 + 6 patches) from the
intellinuxgraphics site and the tearing is the same.
the only other thing that I can try would be the mesa intel-2008-q4 branch.
Would this be any different from the mesa master
Hi,
I have an embedded board with 945GM chipset (1.8GHz Celeron M) connected via
DVI to a 1920x1200 screen. I'm trying to benchmark GL performance a bit
with glxgears, which should be good enough to give a rough estimate of the
device's capabilities. (Is there a better generic GL benchmark tool?)
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:44:04AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 22:37 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
The idea here was to be able to filter easily. I expect that many clients
won't care much about reattachment, but they would care about new MDs.
Having this information
Hi,
I got the following mutex-not-locked warning in linux 2.6.29-rc1.
It appears in a HP 6910p notebook and another G45 desktop.
[ 357.150892] pci :00:02.0: PCI INT A - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 16
[ 357.157653] pci :00:02.0: setting latency timer to 64
[ 357.169915] pci :00:02.0:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:13:03AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
Hi,
I got the following mutex-not-locked warning in linux 2.6.29-rc1.
It appears in a HP 6910p notebook and another G45 desktop.
[ 357.150892] pci :00:02.0: PCI INT A - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 16
[ 357.157653] pci
Keith Packard wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 09:51 +0800, Rob Kramer wrote:
When testing screen rotation to portrait mode, the glxgears framerate
drops from 51 fps (not too great to start with) to 1 fps.
Thanks! We lost our rotation acceleration when we switched to dri_bo's
for pixmaps.
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 13:18 +0800, Rob Kramer wrote:
Cool, thanks. That's a lot better at 18 fps, but still a lot worse than
normal landscape operation. Is that expected? I thought with modern GL
setups, rotation basically came for free -- but I'm a GL newbie :)
The rotation is done by
Johannes Engel wrote on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:23 PM:
Jin, Gordon wrote:
Please let me know if any questions.
What's about the combination XvMC + UXA on 915/945? That seems not to
work, can we expect that back?
Right, this doesn't work so zhenyu disabled it in this release. I'm not sure
Hi,
in Xorg.0.log, I also found these lines:
(**) intel(0): Framebuffer compression enabled
(**) intel(0): Tiling enabled
(==) intel(0): VideoRam: 262144 KB
(II) intel(0): Attempting memory allocation with tiled buffers.
(EE) intel(0): Failed to set tiling on front buffer: rejected by kernel
Keith Packard wrote:
Do you think the 945 chipset is just too slow to rotate a 1920x1200
screen?
One thing that may improve performance a bit is when we get tiling
support for the displayed buffer. That work requires some additional
kernel infrastructure to manage the 'fence' registers
Hi,
I tried to enable UXA. At least glxgears shows some gears now.
However, I'm not sure if it is hardware accellerated.
1. neverball in fullscreen is damn slow (looks like software
rendering). After exit, the screen is empty. Luckily, I can
blindly open the Xfce menu and exit the
33 matches
Mail list logo
