Thomas Jaeger thjae...@gmail.com writes:
I've posted a build log (make -j4) here:
http://pastebin.com/f3f965926
The more I think about it, the more it becomes clear to me that a
recursive call to make can never do the right thing during a parallel build.
Tom
Of course it can. But if you
Am Saturday 06 June 2009 21:03:12 schrieb Leif Bergerhoff:
Peter Harris wrote:
It depends on your toolkit. If you're not using any particular toolkit,
the easiest way is to set _NET_WM_WINDOW_OPACITY on your window. See
http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/xapps/transset/transSet.c?view=markup for
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 08:14:53PM +0800, Nai Xia wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Wu Fengguangfengguang...@intel.com wrote:
Hi list,
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:56:07PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:47:31PM +0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
One scenario that
On Jun 08, 09 17:55:20 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
Why not making the proportional mode simply replace the push mode ?
Why keeping an allegedly inferior panning mode ?
Don't. Some people are used to this behavior.
Matthias
--
Matthias Hopf mh...@suse.de ____ __
Maxfeldstr. 5 /
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 18:16 +0200, Matthias Hopf wrote:
On Jun 08, 09 17:55:20 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
Why not making the proportional mode simply replace the push mode ?
Why keeping an allegedly inferior panning mode ?
Don't. Some people are used to this behavior.
Ok, I was under the
Where are the release engineering schedule, policies, and steps
documented?
Note: I have done at least three official X.org component releases (at
least three different modules). (Official is defined as: I increased
number for release version, did tests, tagged in git, created tarballs,
maybe
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 12:24 -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
- what has the elected board discussed for improving or changing the
release engineering processes and scheduling?
Just to address this one point, recall that the Board is explicitly not
a technical body. It exists to govern the
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Adam Jacksona...@nwnk.net wrote:
Testing is... informal is the polite word. Nobody's stepped up to do it
rigorously, so no one does it.
Peter poked me a while ago to work on autotooling xtest. I have it
just about working nicely to where you just run make check
