Re: Problems configuring minimal xorg

2009-08-14 Thread Risto Suominen
You could try to avoid mouse auto-detection in Xfbdev by specifying -mouse... Risto ___ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: Server crash uploading multiple glyphs at once with XRenderAddGlyphs

2009-08-14 Thread Dave Airlie
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:04 AM, Clemens Eisserer wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to enhance the glyph-upload paths of my java2d-xrender backend > by uploading multiple glyphs at once, however doing so makes > xorg-1.6.99.1 (Fedora rawhide ~20090810) crash quite frequently. > > I experienced those crashes

Server crash uploading multiple glyphs at once with XRenderAddGlyphs

2009-08-14 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi, I tried to enhance the glyph-upload paths of my java2d-xrender backend by uploading multiple glyphs at once, however doing so makes xorg-1.6.99.1 (Fedora rawhide ~20090810) crash quite frequently. I experienced those crashes with both vesa and the intel driver. Twice the crashes happend in gl

Re: X using 95% CPU (intel, latest git)

2009-08-14 Thread walter harms
Carl Worth schrieb: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 06:01:34PM -0400, Andy Neitzke wrote: >> My problem is that frequently, even when the system should be idle, KDE's >> CPU >> monitor applet shows that one of the two processors is fully loaded. When >> this happens, "top" blames the X process, sho

Don't reset the lastDeviceEventTime when doing DPMS actions

2009-08-14 Thread Richard Hughes
When we change the DPMS mode, don't play games with the last event time as this breaks applications using IDLETIME to turn the backlight off after a preset time. This patch fixes gnome-power-manager and xfce-power-manager. Previously gnome-power-manager was working around the idletime reset by set

Installation Instructions?

2009-08-14 Thread steve
Hi Can someone point me to the whereabouts of a working copy of the Installation Instructions mentioned on http://wiki.x.org/wiki/ConfigurationHelp ? It appears someone asked the same question in Dec 2005, when they reported the link as 404. Thanks Steve _