The third and final release candidate for the X.Org X Server 1.7 is now
available. Expect the final server release within a week, pending the state
of the blocker bugs.
The 1.7 branch is frozen, the only commits to go in before the release are
fixes for build errors or blocker bug fixes.
(First, i have to apologize: in an earlier mail, I showed screenshot
made with server side shadows (xcompmgr -s), instead of client side
shadows (xcompmgr -c)).
Le vendredi 25 septembre 2009 à 19:31 +0200, Eeri Kask a écrit :
As it looks like there really seem no apparent _technical_
Le 28/09/2009 11:00, Pradeep Reddy a écrit :
Hi,
What is the possibility to make separate X-screens with Intel graphics
controller? Do anyone succeeded.
Please post me their Xorg.conf or give me any tips ...
It's not possible with the current -intel driver.
If you want separate X screens,
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:53 AM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Vincent Legoll
vincent.leg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Rémi Cardona r...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm even thinking of different warping policies:
- translate: warp to
Keith Packard [2009-09-27 19:47]:
xfree86/modes: Remove all framebuffer support from DGA
This makes the X server crash when running with xf86-video-intel 2.8.1.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0xb7b8c6c0 (LWP 31791)]
0x080f34db in DGAAvailable
The third and final release candidate for the X.Org X Server 1.7 is now
available. Expect the final server release within a week, pending the state
of the blocker bugs.
The 1.7 branch is frozen, the only commits to go in before the release are
fixes for build errors or blocker bug fixes.
Dnia poniedziałek, 28 września 2009, Tilman Sauerbeck napisał:
Keith Packard [2009-09-27 19:47]:
xfree86/modes: Remove all framebuffer support from DGA
This makes the X server crash when running with xf86-video-intel 2.8.1.
But it's OK with intel driver ver. 2.8.99.902, at least in my
Hi folks,
I have to create a customized Ubuntu LiveCD with X, that show a GUI designed
with GTK + Python and Firefox, just it. I need the lightest manner of doing
that.
I don't know how X works exactly, so I would like any advice of
links/tutorials/manuals of how X works or how could I get the
Hi,
Does the X protocol use specific IP ports?
We have been running X in a trusted network situation but now also need to use
X in a WAN / VPN situation. If there are special ports for X, I'll need to have
the firewall guys open them.
Thanks for your help.
Rich Busse | Openview/SiteScope
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 12:56 +0200, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
Keith Packard [2009-09-27 19:47]:
xfree86/modes: Remove all framebuffer support from DGA
This makes the X server crash when running with xf86-video-intel 2.8.1.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
Le lundi 28 septembre 2009 à 12:23 -0500, Busse Rich - rbusse a écrit :
Hi,
Does the X protocol use specific IP ports?
We have been running X in a trusted network situation but now also
need to use X in a WAN / VPN situation. If there are special ports for
X, I'll need to have the
Busse Rich - rbusse wrote:
Hi,
Does the X protocol use specific IP ports?
TCP port 6000 + display id, i.e. :0 = 6000, :10 = 6010.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
Excerpts from Alan Swanson's message of Mon Sep 28 10:18:29 -0700 2009:
And has also broken xf86-video-ati with exactly the same backtrace and
probably every DGA supporting driver is also broken. Quality testing and
not really what you want in stable release... :-/
Oops. And here I thought
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Does the X protocol use specific IP ports?
TCP port 6000 + display id, i.e. :0 = 6000, :10 = 6010.
Also, UDP port 177 for XDMCP, but you probably don't need that (it's
mainly for dumb X terminals).
--
Glynn Clements gl...@gclements.plus.com
Keith Packard wrote:
+/* this is the real function, used only internally */
+Bool
+_xf86_di_dga_init_for_reals (ScreenPtr pScreen);
If they're really internal only, should they be marked _X_HIDDEN
to keep them from being abused by misguided modules?
--
-Alan Coopersmith-
Excerpts from Alan Coopersmith's message of Mon Sep 28 14:08:07 -0700 2009:
If they're really internal only, should they be marked _X_HIDDEN
to keep them from being abused by misguided modules?
How about _X_INTERNAL?
From 1c9c89299c806c0687a1d724452f73a293f5f2f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
Am 28.09.2009 23:16, schrieb David Wake:
Whoops -- meant to send this to the entire list:
It looks as though I need to upgrade X to 1.7 -- thanks guys.
Given that I'm currently on Fedora 11, and Fedora 12 isn't released
yet, is there any way I can upgrade X to 1.7 without screwing up all
my
Am 28.09.2009 23:51, schrieb Stephan Raue:
Am 28.09.2009 23:16, schrieb David Wake:
Whoops -- meant to send this to the entire list:
It looks as though I need to upgrade X to 1.7 -- thanks guys.
Given that I'm currently on Fedora 11, and Fedora 12 isn't released
yet, is there any way I
I have SGI O2, with Gentoo Linux on it. Framebuffer driver set to
1024x768-16bpp, X server (version 1.6.3 from gentoo ports)
configured for using xf86-video-fbdev and DefaultDepth 15 bpp. It
works fine, I recently allow ssh into my x86 box and now I can use
X apps from it. But any GLX apps
Not quite sure what you are asking for, but if you want a light WM then you
should check out EvilWM. Besides being EVIL its also very light ;)
http://www.6809.org.uk/evilwm/
good luck.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Lucas Mocellin lucasmocel...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi folks,
I have to create
Did you try the Xorg included twm? Twm itself uses few resources.
kind regards
Kai-Uwe Behrmann
--
developing for colour management
www.behrmann.name + www.oyranos.org
Am 28.09.09, 17:58 -0700 schrieb Tony Bones:
should check out EvilWM. Besides being EVIL its also very light ;)
21 matches
Mail list logo
