Dear all,
I want to create a *fixed non-resizable window* in Xserver environment.
Also I want to mask any *resize event* from the corressponding window.
Please tell me ways to achieve this.
Thanks in advance.
-Piyush
___
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org:
The following patch fixes Novell bug 568811:
VNC Installation aborts right in the middle due to an assertion in
Xvnc/libpixman
The bug seems occur only on *very* special occasions (in this case, only
in SLES, but *not* in SLED, which is based on the same code basis...).
Backtrace looks as
On Mar 24, 10 13:25:13 +0200, Jonathan Morton wrote:
Drawing a string containing spaces but also other characters would
result in a non-degenerate region, presumably. So the bug might be
triggered by a string containing only a space.
Sounds reasonable.
It may be appropriate to use a belt
Hello,
I have already updated SummerOfCodeIdeas wiki page about that but as
it's coming a bit late in the GSoC schedule, I'm also posting this here.
So, here is a project idea for the GSoC:
One of the main area preventing XCB wide adoption over Xlib is input
support. There are some
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:02:20AM -0400, Daniel Gnoutcheff wrote:
Hello all!
I'm planing to apply for GSoC, and Xorg is one of the projects I'm
considering. I see that KMS a non-KMSed driver is on the ideas list.
One of the ideas I'm considering is the KMSification of the cirrus
driver
Hi Matthias,
The following patch fixes Novell bug 568811:
VNC Installation aborts right in the middle due to an assertion in
Xvnc/libpixman
The bug seems occur only on *very* special occasions (in this case, only
in SLES, but *not* in SLED, which is based on the same code basis...).
On Mar 24, 10 18:28:07 +0100, Soeren Sandmann wrote:
Please note that while pixman is not as strict as the X server in who
can push to the repository, it is not a complete free-for-all.
Committing small, obvious patches that fixes typos or oversights is
fine, but don't commit non-obvious stuff
Matthias Hopf mh...@suse.de writes:
This patch in particular, I don't think shold ship with no testing at
all. So please revert it, and we can consider it again for 0.19.x.
I'm fine with that if you consider it problematic. Given that the
situation it changes should actually not occur at
On Mar 24, 10 19:19:15 +0100, Soeren Sandmann wrote:
However, what happens if the code would have been compiled with -NDEBUG?
Is the code path stable with empty regions? If it is, it can be argued
that the patch is not necessary, but it could also be argued that the
assert() shouldn't have
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:02:20 -0400, Daniel Gnoutcheff dan...@gnoutcheff.name
wrote:
Hello all!
I'm planing to apply for GSoC, and Xorg is one of the projects I'm
considering. I see that KMS a non-KMSed driver is on the ideas list.
One of the ideas I'm considering is the KMSification of the
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:02:20 -0400, Daniel Gnoutcheff
dan...@gnoutcheff.name wrote:
Hello all!
I'm planing to apply for GSoC, and Xorg is one of the projects I'm
considering. I see that KMS a non-KMSed driver is on the
Comparing your log file with mine I couldn't spot anything special.
Can you try different depth and see if it change something ?
Also, are you using kernel video driver for silicon motion for your
frame buffer and does it works ?
___
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 03:11:38PM +0100, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
I have already updated SummerOfCodeIdeas wiki page about that but as
it's coming a bit late in the GSoC schedule, I'm also posting this here.
Out of interest - how far did Mariusz get last year? I think his GSoC
project was
Wow, seems there's a lot more interest in this idea than I expected!
Thanks for the feedback!
Eric Anholt wrote:
Sounds like a fun project, and doable. I'd just recommend that you
reduce the scope slightly from a full KMS driver to an unaccelerated KMS
driver ... [snip]
I think there would
14 matches
Mail list logo
