Re: [sugar] rendering test

2008-10-02 Thread Bernie Innocenti
d? Remove the unused PutImage hook from the ShmFuncs structure. Also maybe move the whole structure definition in the xserver as it doesn't seem like something that belongs to the public xextproto interface. -- \___/ Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ _| X | Sugar Labs Team

Re: [sugar] rendering test

2008-09-30 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 18:46 +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote: >> Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Riccardo Lucchese >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 12:43 +0200, Riccardo L

Re: [sugar] rendering test

2008-09-28 Thread Bernie Innocenti
eaf functions tell us very little. memcpy() might be called from many different places to do different things. oprofile also supports stack traces, but for some reason I could never get them to work on the XO. One clue is that oprofile cannot use the NMI interrupt on the XO and falls bac

Re: [sugar] rendering test

2008-09-28 Thread Bernie Innocenti
s slower. It's hard to tell why, but it might have to do with loosing XShmPut() (MIT shared memory), excessive migration of pixmaps to the framebuffer, and so on. X 1.5 was supposed to have a much better EXA, at least judging from the stream of patches landed on the tree.