Quinn Harris wrote:
...
> Something at the xserver level would be nice. A global option or better yet
> a
> way to instruct xrandr to treat two or more specified screens as one to all X
> software. This is basically another feature regression with xrandr and
> should
> probably be considered
On Thursday 09 April 2009 10:39:47 Alan Cox wrote:
> > > if someone massively resizes a window with backing store (remembering
> > > it can be mostly offscreen) your X server explodes.
> >
> > Remind us why turning it on for all windows all the time (Composite) is
> > better than for one window? ;o
On 04/08/2009 05:00 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote:
...
> > >>>If only the latest release is "API-stable", by definition it's not
> > >>>stable.
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 05:34:48PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
...
> > This cannot be deduced from that line. You need to review your math.
On Wednesday 08
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 21:28:47 Alan Cox wrote:
> Backing store has long been off by default in Xfree/Xorg. Fundamentally
> its a dumb design issue in the concept of backing store - it means the
> server has to consume huge amounts of memory keeping copies of stuff and
> if someone massively r
On Monday 30 March 2009 11:40:33 Simon Thum wrote:
> Bill Crawford wrote:
> > On Saturday 28 March 2009 17:42:54 Simon Thum wrote:
> >> Rémi Cardona wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >>> Can't we work something out with Qt folks?
> >>
> >
On Saturday 28 March 2009 17:42:54 Simon Thum wrote:
> Rémi Cardona wrote:
...
> > Can't we work something out with Qt folks?
>
> Good idea, but I think the above sounds like adopting a
> what-breaks-gets-fixed policy is the most realistic option. Adam
> probably has to say something enlightening.
On Thursday 26 March 2009 06:05:32 Dave Airlie wrote:
> Option "AccelDFS" "true"
Just out of curiosity, why is this needed? I thought compositing was mostly
just
texturing onto the root window back buffer and could mostly be done in h/w?
--
Bill, also wondering why compositing seems to be slo
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 15:50:08 Simon Thum wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > Debian (and Ubuntu by proxy) has a patch that makes libtool only add
> > needed libraries (i.e., those added on the command line) to the
> > dependency_libs setting in .la files. Unfortunately, I think it still
> > has
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 18:37:37 Marius Gedminas wrote:
...
> What about Pyro, then? http://www.pyrodesktop.org/Main_Page
Oh, look, ActiveX!
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
On Wednesday 11 March 2009 08:11:43 Tino Keitel wrote:
> As LCDs usually like vertical refresh rates of 60 Hz, you also
> shouldn't use a 75 Hz mode.
Most LCDs seem to be capable of 75, and I (alone?) can see the difference, at
least on my Hanns·G monitors at work.
__
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 20:01:18 Samuel Thibault wrote:
> - have X.org fallback to dummy when the autodetect driver does not work.
> May make sighted users wonder why their screen is black, but well.
If you're going to do this, you'll need Ctrl-Alt-BS to work, or people will
think that their
On Thursday 26 February 2009 18:13:01 Dirk wrote:
> Well, then you haven't had it re-enabling itself over and over again to
> interfere with your games, yet.
>
> Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 18:58 +0100, Dirk wrote:
> >> People who believe they need an accelerated pointer to click
On Thursday 19 February 2009 12:09:30 Simon Thum wrote:
> Sorry for the noise. I haven't found the issue, but a majority of .pc's
> in my system doesn't output cflags. So it's something configuration- or
> pkc-config related.
In theory a lot of them shouldn't need to, because they're installed in
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 16:43:00 Ben Gamari wrote:
> On my machine (Fedora Rawhide), piglit wouldn't build without
> including stdio.h in glean's environ.cpp for snprint().
Should be and possibly then std::snprinft(...) if it's C++.
___
xorg mail
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 18:16:49 Jeff Chua wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > Patch #242 - 2009/2/15
>
> The window title bar text seems broken in 242. Recompiled 241 and works on
> 241.
>
> Here's the string that I used to set the ti
On Monday 09 February 2009 11:47:44 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I need assistance in finding out just why on earth xorg decides not to
> use 1360x768 despite the monitor returning this in the DDC and having
> it in the Modes/PreferredMode option.
>
>
> Xorg.0.log: http://pastebin.ca/1329034
>
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 11:13:20 Frank de Lange wrote:
> Looks to me like X does not use more than 1.7% of CPU so that is not out
> of the ordinary. To find out more about where the memory goes you can
> install xrestop to see if something leaks somewhere. Either run it
> interactivally and w
On Sunday 28 December 2008 08:56:50 Matan Drori wrote:
> Bump, adding some backtraces:
> Dump 1:
> #0 _X11TransWritev (ciptr=0x0, buf=0x21b96720, size=1) at
> ../../lib/xtrans/Xtrans.c:911
> #1 0x20093910 in _XSendClientPrefix (dpy=,
> client=, auth_proto=0x0, auth_string=0x0,
> p
On Wednesday 10 December 2008 06:59:13 Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in Xserver 1.5.3, when running the ati (radeon) driver in "zaphod" mode
> (ie one X screen per monitor: :0.0, :0.1) the mouse is stuck on the 1st
> screen. This is with the "mouse" driver on OpenBSD (ie no evdev/hal
> involved).
On Wednesday 10 December 2008 20:12:19 Glynn Clements wrote:
> If you want to avoid the situation where large amounts of memory are
> allocated for pixmaps, then can't be freed due to other data sharing
> the same memory, you're likely to be better off controlling the
> allocation of the pixmaps t
On Friday 05 December 2008 22:08:13 Alex Villacís Lasso wrote:
> The failure to read the PCI ROM as documented seems like a kernel bug. I
> opened http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12168 for it.
This affects kernel modesetting as well, since the cards aren't POSTed properly
in these si
On Friday 24 October 2008 15:43:44 Bill Crawford wrote:
> On Friday 24 October 2008 15:37:57 Mateusz Jan Dominikowski wrote:
> > Busid"PCI:0:1:1"
>
> Try 0:1:0
Ignore me, I'm especially blind today.
On Friday 24 October 2008 15:37:57 Mateusz Jan Dominikowski wrote:
> Busid"PCI:0:1:1"
Try 0:1:0
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
On Wednesday 22 October 2008 00:54:16 Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-September/039020.html
Is anyone else currently working on this? It's fairly critical for anyone using
multi-gpu systems (e.g. me, but I'm sure I can't be the only one).
Failing that ...
On Sunday 19 October 2008 19:49:02 Corbin Simpson wrote:
> You need GEM+KMS for Radeons. Not sure on the Intel requirements. (The
> KMS stuff *isn't* going upstream this cycle IIUC.)
Any news on when multiple GPUs in the box will be supported? My last try led to
OOPSes during boot and corrupted
On 09/09/2008, Yan Seiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Because most of my users will not have a terminal session open. Typically
> they use a browser full-screen, so I need a popup to notify them.
Spawn a sub-shell for each user, run "sudo -u $user zenity --warning
'about to reboot'" ... ? (i
26 matches
Mail list logo
