Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.9.0

2009-10-07 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 08:10:06PM -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > Release 2.9.0 (2009-09-28) > == > We are pleased to announce the 2.9.0 release of the xf86-video-intel > driver. (If you have been following along at home, this release is > identical to the 2.8.99.902 release can

Re: very slow performance of glxgears (68 fps)

2009-02-01 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 11:55:56AM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 18:11 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 01:29:49PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > > > > $ glxgears > > > > Failed to initialize TTM buffer manager. Fal

Re: very slow performance of glxgears (68 fps)

2009-01-30 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 01:29:49PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > > $ glxgears > > Failed to initialize TTM buffer manager. Falling back to classic. > > 300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.884 FPS > > 299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.621 FPS > > 300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.818 FPS > > glxgears is not a

[PATCH] Dead(?) code in monitor timing fallbacks

2009-01-07 Thread Bryce Harrington
In studying how the xserver handles undefined h/v sync rates (e.g. ancient monitors that don't provide EDID or DDC), I noticed this bit of code that doesn't appear to ever be executable. Am I missing something, or can this code be safely dropped? Or, what is/was it supposed to do? Bryce diff --