On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 09:22 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> A better way is when it is target to the maint branch (2.6 in your case)
>> you should try to commit on it and merge it from time to time at master
>> (or 2.7 in your case).
>
> Th
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 09:22 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> A better way is when it is target to the maint branch (2.6 in your case)
> you should try to commit on it and merge it from time to time at master
> (or 2.7 in your case).
That doesn't help when you don't know beforehand that some patch w
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 08:58 +0200, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> Is it planned to add in this release support for tiling on i915-class
> hardware
> with memory in dual-channel interleaved mode? (Bugs 19873 and 19738 are
> related with this issue)
The best place to watch which bugs have been fixed
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 09:22 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> > It would be misleading to take the output of something like "git log
>> > 2.6.3..2.6.99.901" since that would list several bug fixes as being
>> > "new" since 2.6.3 when in fact the
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 09:22 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > It would be misleading to take the output of something like "git log
> > 2.6.3..2.6.99.901" since that would list several bug fixes as being
> > "new" since 2.6.3 when in fact the same fixes were already cherry-picked
> > to the 2.6 bran
Carl Worth writes:
[...]
> It would be misleading to take the output of something like "git log
> 2.6.3..2.6.99.901" since that would list several bug fixes as being
> "new" since 2.6.3 when in fact the same fixes were already cherry-picked
> to the 2.6 branch and were present in 2.6.3.
A bett
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 11:47 +, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Carl Worth at 10/03/09 01:54 did gyre and gimble:
> > Here is the first release candidate in preparation for the upcoming
> > 2.7.0 release.
>
> What is the (rough) timescale for the first 2.7.x release?
A few weeks or s
'Twas brillig, and Carl Worth at 10/03/09 01:54 did gyre and gimble:
> Here is the first release candidate in preparation for the upcoming
> 2.7.0 release.
What is the (rough) timescale for the first 2.7.x release?
> All changes from 2.6.0 to 2.6.99.901
>
Doe
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 20:16 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Here's an untested patch (too old drm on this system) that should do the
> right thing.
Thanks! My testing makes this look good.
Committed to master and cherry-picked to 2.7.
-Carl
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Daniel Gultsch wrote on Tuesday, March 10, 2009 7:06 PM:
> On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:54:05 -0700
> Carl Worth wrote:
>
>> Here is the first release candidate in preparation for the upcoming
>> 2.7.0 release.
> (...)
>> A complete "shortlog" of all changes since 2.6.0 is included below.
>> As we move
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 05:34:55PM -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
>
> Looks like we need to make our tar-file generation more clever, (or
> actually less clever). It's configuring the list of files to include in
> the tar file based on whether xvmclib is detected on the build machine.
> You can probably
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 10:05 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 03:47 Tue 10 Mar , Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> > Could it be that the tarball is incomplete?
...
> > i965_xvmc.c:49:25: error: ipicture.g4b: No such file or directory
> > i965_xvmc.c:52:21: error: null.g4b: No such file or directory
...
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 18:46 +0100, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:34:28AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > On 18:29 Tue 10 Mar , Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> > > BTW, make dist creates 2.6.99.1 and not 2.6.99.901 tarballs ...
> >
> > You're on master, not 2.7 branch.
>
> Ouch. T
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 11:06 +, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> will the tearing issue be fixed in 2.7.0? I've read about waiting for
> vblank in the changelog but I'm not sure if this will fix it. Could
> somebody confirm this please?
I'm not sure what *the* tearing issue is. Tearing sounds like a la
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:34:28AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 18:29 Tue 10 Mar , Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> > BTW, make dist creates 2.6.99.1 and not 2.6.99.901 tarballs ...
>
> You're on master, not 2.7 branch.
Ouch. Thanks for the hint. I didn't know there is already a 2.7
branch.
Than
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 10:05 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 03:47 Tue 10 Mar , Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> > Could it be that the tarball is incomplete?
> >
> > [...]
> > libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I/usr/include/xorg
> > -I/usr/in
> > clude/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/drm -
On 18:29 Tue 10 Mar , Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> BTW, make dist creates 2.6.99.1 and not 2.6.99.901 tarballs ...
You're on master, not 2.7 branch.
--
Thanks,
Donnie
Donnie Berkholz
X team lead, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com
pgpumGkPowZUP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:05:27AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 03:47 Tue 10 Mar , Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> > Could it be that the tarball is incomplete?
> >
> > [...]
> > libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I/usr/include/xorg
> > -I/usr/in
> > clude/pixman-1 -I/usr/includ
On 03:47 Tue 10 Mar , Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> Could it be that the tarball is incomplete?
>
> [...]
> libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I/usr/include/xorg
> -I/usr/in
> clude/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/drm -I/usr/include/xorg -I/usr/include/pixman-1
> -I
> /usr/include/drm -I/u
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:54:05 -0700
Carl Worth wrote:
> Here is the first release candidate in preparation for the upcoming
> 2.7.0 release.
(...)
> A complete "shortlog" of all changes since 2.6.0 is included below. As
> we move toward the actual 2.7.0 release I'd like to have a shorter
> bullete
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 03:54:05 Carl Worth wrote:
> Here is the first release candidate in preparation for the upcoming
> 2.7.0 release.
Is it planned to add in this release support for tiling on i915-class hardware
with memory in dual-channel interleaved mode? (Bugs 19873 and 19738 are
relate
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 06:54:05PM -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> Here is the first release candidate in preparation for the upcoming
> 2.7.0 release.
>
> git tag: xf86-video-intel-2.6.99.901
>
> http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/driver/xf86-video-intel-2.6.99.901.tar.bz2
> MD5: ac1766d2
Here is the first release candidate in preparation for the upcoming
2.7.0 release.
git tag: xf86-video-intel-2.6.99.901
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/driver/xf86-video-intel-2.6.99.901.tar.bz2
MD5: ac1766d206bbfe7318704848641598f9 xf86-video-intel-2.6.99.901.tar.bz2
SHA1: dbe9af
23 matches
Mail list logo
