On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 13:24 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
For sure the information contained in git logs don't measure how high-level
the
changes are being submitted, but it would be nice to devise some metrics,
apart
from the usual LOC, which could help us visualize the architectural
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 08:16:34PM +0200, ext Greg KH wrote:
Note, I have a bunch of the xorg developers already in our main gitdm
configuration file due to me running the numbers a long time ago for a
Linux Plumbers conference talk. I think it's somewhere public as well,
but I can't find it
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 09:40:50AM -0400, Keith Packard wrote:
Not a huge number of changes this week; a couple of bug fixes, some
server log cleanups and some Xephyr changes.
Summary below, but first I've gone over the bugs in the 1.9 tracking
bug:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Tiago Vignatti tiago.vigna...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 03:40:50PM +0200, Keith Packard wrote:
Not a huge number of changes this week; a couple of bug fixes, some
server log cleanups and some Xephyr changes.
I got gitdm working with
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 06:45:48PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
[0] On the top of the Jonathan's tree I applied some patches concerning X.Org.
I'm cc-ing him also who might be interested to fetch it:
ttp://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vignatti/gitdm/
I think you ment:
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 07:24:25PM +0200, ext Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 06:45:48PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
[0] On the top of the Jonathan's tree I applied some patches concerning
X.Org.
I'm cc-ing him also who might be interested to fetch it:
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 08:45:33PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/~vignatti/gitdm
$ git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/~vignatti/gitdm
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/gregkh/tmp/gitdm/.git/
remote: Counting objects: 153, done.
remote:
Tiago Vignatti tiago.vigna...@nokia.com wrote:
If I have more motivation I'll try to get some stats comparing different
versions of the server development and maybe other modules. Also, if you are
interested on different kind of statistics I can run more. Suggestions are
very welcome and
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:15:58 -0300
Fernando Carrijo fcarr...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
For sure the information contained in git logs don't measure how high-level
the
changes are being submitted, but it would be nice to devise some metrics,
apart
from the usual LOC, which could help us visualize
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:24:02 -0600, Jonathan Corbet cor...@lwn.net wrote:
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:15:58 -0300
Fernando Carrijo fcarr...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
For sure the information contained in git logs don't measure how high-level
the
changes are being submitted, but it would be nice to
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Fernando Carrijo wrote:
Tiago Vignatti tiago.vigna...@nokia.com wrote:
If I have more motivation I'll try to get some stats comparing different
versions of the server development and maybe other modules. Also, if you are
interested on different kind of statistics I can run
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:15:58 -0300
Fernando Carrijo fcarr...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
For sure the information contained in git logs don't measure how high-level the
changes are being submitted, but it would be nice to devise some metrics, apart
from the
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 05:47:59PM -0300, Fernando Carrijo wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:24:02 -0600, Jonathan Corbet cor...@lwn.net wrote:
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:15:58 -0300
Fernando Carrijo fcarr...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
For sure the information contained in git logs don't measure how
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 09:40:50AM -0400, Keith Packard wrote:
Not a huge number of changes this week; a couple of bug fixes, some
server log cleanups and some Xephyr changes.
Summary below, but first I've gone over the bugs in the 1.9 tracking
bug:
14 matches
Mail list logo
