On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 08:16:34PM +0200, ext Greg KH wrote:
>
> Note, I have a bunch of the xorg developers already in our "main" gitdm
> configuration file due to me running the numbers a long time ago for a
> Linux Plumbers conference talk. I think it's somewhere public as well,
> but I can't f
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 13:24 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > For sure the information contained in git logs don't measure how high-level
> > the
> > changes are being submitted, but it would be nice to devise some metrics,
> > apart
> > from the usual LOC, which could help us visualize the arch
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 09:40:50AM -0400, Keith Packard wrote:
>
> Not a huge number of changes this week; a couple of bug fixes, some
> server log cleanups and some Xephyr changes.
>
> Summary below, but first I've gone over the bugs in the 1.9 tracking
> bug:
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/s
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 05:47:59PM -0300, Fernando Carrijo wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:24:02 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:15:58 -0300
> > Fernando Carrijo wrote:
> >
> > > For sure the information contained in git logs don't measure how
> > > high-level the
> > >
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:15:58 -0300
Fernando Carrijo wrote:
For sure the information contained in git logs don't measure how high-level the
changes are being submitted, but it would be nice to devise some metrics, apart
from the usual LOC, which could
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Fernando Carrijo wrote:
Tiago Vignatti wrote:
If I have more motivation I'll try to get some stats comparing different
versions of the server development and maybe other modules. Also, if you are
interested on different kind of statistics I can run more. Suggestions are
ve
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:24:02 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:15:58 -0300
> Fernando Carrijo wrote:
>
> > For sure the information contained in git logs don't measure how high-level
> > the
> > changes are being submitted, but it would be nice to devise some metrics,
> > a
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:15:58 -0300
Fernando Carrijo wrote:
> For sure the information contained in git logs don't measure how high-level
> the
> changes are being submitted, but it would be nice to devise some metrics,
> apart
> from the usual LOC, which could help us visualize the architectura
Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> If I have more motivation I'll try to get some stats comparing different
> versions of the server development and maybe other modules. Also, if you are
> interested on different kind of statistics I can run more. Suggestions are
> very welcome and appreciated (for instance
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 08:45:33PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> > > git://anongit.freedesktop.org/~vignatti/gitdm
> >
> > $ git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/~vignatti/gitdm
> > Initialized empty Git repository in /home/gregkh/tmp/gitdm/.git/
> > remote: Counting objects: 153, done.
>
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 07:24:25PM +0200, ext Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 06:45:48PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> > [0] On the top of the Jonathan's tree I applied some patches concerning
> > X.Org.
> > I'm cc-ing him also who might be interested to fetch it:
> > ttp://cgit.free
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 06:45:48PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> [0] On the top of the Jonathan's tree I applied some patches concerning X.Org.
> I'm cc-ing him also who might be interested to fetch it:
> ttp://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vignatti/gitdm/
I think you ment:
http://cgit.freede
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 03:40:50PM +0200, Keith Packard wrote:
>>
>> Not a huge number of changes this week; a couple of bug fixes, some
>> server log cleanups and some Xephyr changes.
>
> I got gitdm working with xserver [0] and here
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 03:40:50PM +0200, Keith Packard wrote:
>
> Not a huge number of changes this week; a couple of bug fixes, some
> server log cleanups and some Xephyr changes.
I got gitdm working with xserver [0] and here are the results from 1.8.0 until
1.8.9.904.
Processed 441 cset
Not a huge number of changes this week; a couple of bug fixes, some
server log cleanups and some Xephyr changes.
Summary below, but first I've gone over the bugs in the 1.9 tracking
bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=27592&hide_resolved=1
I'd like to encourage anyone wi
15 matches
Mail list logo
