Re: [PATCH] [pixmap] rename/convert devKind and devPrivate fields

2008-10-09 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Michel Dänzer >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 19:20 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote: O

Re: [PATCH] [pixmap] rename/convert devKind and devPrivate fields

2008-10-09 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Michel Dänzer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 19:20 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>

Re: [PATCH] [pixmap] rename/convert devKind and devPrivate fields

2008-10-09 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 19:20 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > These names are supposedly historical, but everyone seems to use them >> > for th

Re: [PATCH] [pixmap] rename/convert devKind and devPrivate fields

2008-10-09 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 19:20 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > These names are supposedly historical, but everyone seems to use them > > for the same purpose. > > I am aware this may require a few minor changes to (for ex

Re: [PATCH] [pixmap] rename/convert devKind and devPrivate fields

2008-10-08 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > These names are supposedly historical, but everyone seems to use them > for the same purpose. > I am aware this may require a few minor changes to (for example) exa > drivers with driver based memory allocations. > I pers

Re: [PATCH] [pixmap] rename/convert devKind and devPrivate fields

2008-10-07 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 08:04:52PM +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > It would be nice to know if all !xfree86 has the equivilant of > VIDEODRV_ABI_VERSION. Nothing else has loadable modules. Cheers, Daniel signature.asc Description: Digital signature _

Re: [PATCH] [pixmap] rename/convert devKind and devPrivate fields

2008-10-07 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Aaron Plattner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 08:04:52PM +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote: >> These names are supposedly historical, but everyone seems to use them >> for the same purpose. >> I am aware this may require a few minor changes to (for

Re: [PATCH] [pixmap] rename/convert devKind and devPrivate fields

2008-10-07 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Maarten Maathuis wrote: > These names are supposedly historical, but everyone seems to use them > for the same purpose. > I am aware this may require a few minor changes to (for example) exa > drivers with driver based memory allocations. > I personally believe in having clear names rather than som