On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 08:22:17PM -0500, Thomas Jaeger wrote:
> From d6ea6d45d5d3ca74bb665f32439f440b30a8939d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Thomas Jaeger
> Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:17:02 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Don't release grabs unless all buttons are up
>
> Previously, only buttons <= 5
Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:55:40AM -0500, Thomas Jaeger wrote:
>> From 3f8ba578ad18b7135031197f6ec5145afcd1479a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Thomas Jaeger
>> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:55:09 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] Count the number o
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:55:40AM -0500, Thomas Jaeger wrote:
> From 3f8ba578ad18b7135031197f6ec5145afcd1479a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Thomas Jaeger
> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:55:09 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Count the number of logically down buttons in buttonsDown
>
&
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 11:59 -0500, Thomas Jaeger wrote:
> >> if ((grab->coreGrab && !button->state) && ... ||
> >> (!grab->coreGrab && AllButtonsAreUp(b))
Unless I'm completely lost, you shouldn't need to make this distinction
(see previous message).
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
signature.a
Thomas Jaeger wrote:
>> This puts us in a difficult position. Core requires us to release the grab
>> if,
>> say, only button 6 is down. XI requires us to maintain the grab.
>> I think we need a more complex solution than the one you proposed: test
>> whether the passive grab is a core or an XI gr
state) && ... ||
> (!grab->coreGrab && AllButtonsAreUp(b))
>From 3f8ba578ad18b7135031197f6ec5145afcd1479a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Jaeger
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:55:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Count the number of logically down buttons in buttonsDown
This fi