Hi,
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:34:14PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 09:07:07AM +0100, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
> > The next big question - joysticks. If Wine ever decides to use X11 for
> > joysticks we'll need much more then what's available now in XI 1.x
> > (force-
Sorry about the delay.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 09:07:07AM +0100, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
> Since we need XI2 in Wine to fix some major input issues (relative mouse
> input) I forwarded your spec draft to our mailinglist and one of our devs
> has some questions.
> I'd say I like it so far.
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 06:27 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
> This is roughly relayed from what I remember telling you on IRC last
> week. Stupid failboat hotel internet.
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 04:46:19PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > ┌───
> > XIDeviceEvent:
> > [
Hi,
This is roughly relayed from what I remember telling you on IRC last
week. Stupid failboat hotel internet.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 04:46:19PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> ┌───
> XIDeviceEvent:
> [...]
> buttons:SETofBUTTONBIT
>
Peter Hutterer wrote:
> that detail the changes made? If so, yes - definitely an option and I'll try
> to spec something decent out.
Yep, that's what I meant.
> I remember now. We said that we can basically include axis information twice,
> once in its raw state, unclipped and unaccelerated, once
: Vitaliy Margolen
An: Roderick Colenbrander
CC: wine-de...@winehq.org
Betreff: Re: Fwd: Draft XI 2 protocol specification
Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
> Hi Vitaliy,
>
> Peter Hutterer has submitted a draft specification of Xinput2 to the xorg
>
mailinglist. As you know it will offer re
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 04:32:28PM +0100, Simon Thum wrote:
>
> some rants from me:
> > ┌───
> > XIDeviceHierarchyEvent:
> > GENERICEVENTDATA
> > flags: SETofHIERARCHYMASK
> > ndevices: CARD16
> > ──
Hi Peter,
some rants from me:
> ┌───
> XIDeviceHierarchyEvent:
> GENERICEVENTDATA
> flags: SETofHIERARCHYMASK
> ndevices: CARD16
> ───
> devices:LISTofINT16
> └───
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:44:04AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 22:37 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> > The idea here was to be able to filter easily. I expect that many clients
> > won't care much about reattachment, but they would care about new MDs.
> > Having this infor
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 22:37 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> The idea here was to be able to filter easily. I expect that many clients
> won't care much about reattachment, but they would care about new MDs.
> Having this information may prove useful. As for the deviceids - same idea.
I guess this
First, thanks for the comments.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:09:22PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 16:46 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> > An XDeviceHierarchyChangedEvent is sent whenever the device hierarchy
> > has
> > been changed by either the client, or by serve
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 16:46 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> An XDeviceHierarchyChangedEvent is sent whenever the device hierarchy has
> been changed by either the client, or by server-internal events. The flags
> specify all types of hierarchy modifiations that have occured.
> Clie
I know we're all thinking about getting 1.6 out, but here's the next lot of
big changes that I really need some feedback on. LCA is coming up and napkins
want to be written on, so the more feedback before that happens, the better.
As a friendly reminder, the X Protocol has a tendency to be set in
13 matches
Mail list logo
