On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 26 December 2008, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Shunichi Fuji wrote:
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:29:38 -0500
>>> From: Gene Heskett
>>> To: Shunichi Fuji
>>> Subject: Re
On Friday 26 December 2008, Alex Deucher wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Shunichi Fuji wrote:
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:29:38 -0500
>> From: Gene Heskett
>> To: Shunichi Fuji
>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 6.9.0.91 - release candidate
>>
>>
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Shunichi Fuji wrote:
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:29:38 -0500
> From: Gene Heskett
> To: Shunichi Fuji
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 6.9.0.91 - release candidate
>
>
> On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Shunichi Fuji wrote:
>
2008/12/24 Gene Heskett :
>>> But now this exposes a new problem I don't recall in these exact words,
>>> when I do a startx, it cannot load the kernel radeon module
>>> (this from the Xorg.0.log)
>
> Any comment on this?
...
> for the health & well being of an HD2400-Pro (rv610) card?
The direct
On Wednesday 24 December 2008, Dave Airlie wrote:
[...]
>> I found the one in xf86-video-radeonhd-1.2.4, and copied it to the src
>> tree beside the other .h files, and it built, and I've installed it and
>> running it, although not much is changed. glxgears is still moping along
>> at about 875
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Shunichi Fuji wrote:
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:29:38 -0500
> From: Gene Heskett
> To: Shunichi Fuji
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 6.9.0.91 - release candidate
>
>
> On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Shunichi Fuji wrote:
>>
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:29:38 -0500
From: Gene Heskett
To: Shunichi Fuji
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 6.9.0.91 - release candidate
On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Shunichi Fuji wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:13:58 -0500
>
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> gcc -DHAVE_