On Thu, 2008-12-25 at 01:11 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> as far as I can tell your patch was never committed. Was this issue
> fixed somehow, or is this still relevant?
I appear to have lost it...
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 15:30:09 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 14:25 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > What would it take to include the attached patch for dixfonts.c?
>
> Uh, you've uncovered a serious bug in DIX. The XSELinux patches tried to
> automatically
