Re: companies contributing to X [was: Re: Respository vandalism by r...@...fd.o]

2010-11-25 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 02:56:32PM -0700, Matt Dew wrote: This I'm curious about. Are there more companies that feel it's too-hard/not-worth-while for companies to contribute stuff to Xorg? I know the linux kernel has this issue, but is X's contribution difficulty larger? I think X faces

Re: companies contributing to X [was: Re: Respository vandalism by r...@...fd.o]

2010-11-25 Thread Alan Cox
but simply being more enthusiastic about accepting contributions doesn't seem like a great plan (compare the code quality of nouveau, intel and radeon to that of some of the out of tree drivers, for instance) I think that is a little naïve. There is a difference between vendors attempting to

Re: companies contributing to X [was: Re: Respository vandalism by r...@...fd.o]

2010-11-25 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 09:23:38PM +, Alan Cox wrote: but simply being more enthusiastic about accepting contributions doesn't seem like a great plan (compare the code quality of nouveau, intel and radeon to that of some of the out of tree drivers, for instance) I think that is a

Re: Xorg 7.5 freezes after Linux kernel upgrade

2010-11-25 Thread Jeremy Henty
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:39:18AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Jeremy Henty onepo...@starurchin.org wrote: I am currently happily running Xorg 7.5 on Linux kernel 2.6.35.8 .  If I upgrade  the kernel to 2.6.36  the screen goes black  (even with