Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-03-03 Thread Eric Anholt
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 14:29 +0200, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: On Sunday 01 March 2009 13:40:16 Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: Thanks, fix works for me (no more memory leakage) :) Btw, it seems that it's a fix of catalyst, not of the real leak: after ~24h of usage 398mb of swap is used. lsof |

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-03-03 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 20:13:39 Eric Anholt wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 14:29 +0200, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: On Sunday 01 March 2009 13:40:16 Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: Thanks, fix works for me (no more memory leakage) :) Btw, it seems that it's a fix of catalyst, not of the real leak:

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-03-02 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
On Sunday 01 March 2009 13:40:16 Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: Thanks, fix works for me (no more memory leakage) :) Btw, it seems that it's a fix of catalyst, not of the real leak: after ~24h of usage 398mb of swap is used. lsof | grep drm mm object | wc -l shows 700, is it OK? signature.asc

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-03-02 Thread Jacek Luczak
Eric Anholt pisze: On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 19:13 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 14:10 +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote: this release is totally unusable while running in UXA. System eats lot of memory, including swapping. Is this that, reported earlier, ,,memory

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-03-02 Thread Jacek Luczak
Jacek Luczak pisze: Eric Anholt pisze: On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 19:13 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 14:10 +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote: this release is totally unusable while running in UXA. System eats lot of memory, including swapping. Is this that, reported

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-03-01 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
On Saturday 28 February 2009 07:21:54 Eric Anholt wrote: On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 19:13 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 14:10 +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote: this release is totally unusable while running in UXA. System eats lot of memory, including

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-28 Thread Brice Goglin
Eric Anholt wrote: Same problem here with libdrm 2.4.5, intel 2.6.2, Xserver 1.6-rc2, Mesa 7.3 on Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27a2] (rev 03) Nothing specific needed to reproduce the problem, just use X :) As soon as I start a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-28 Thread Johannes Engel
Eric Anholt wrote: I think the problem here was the DRI2 tiling fix, which was great for the 915-class 3D performance regression but bad for 915-class 2D. I've pushed a fix to master that should help. If it does, I'll try to get a 2.6.3 out soon. commit

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-28 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote: ... I think the problem here was the DRI2 tiling fix, which was great for the 915-class 3D performance regression but bad for 915-class 2D.  I've pushed a fix to master that should help.  If it does, I'll try to get a 2.6.3

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-28 Thread Adam Lantos
Great work Eric, it finally fixed memory problems with my i915. We definitely need 2.6.3 with this piece of code :) cheers, Adam On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote: On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 19:13 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: On Wed, 2009-02-25

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-27 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 19:13 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 14:10 +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote: this release is totally unusable while running in UXA. System eats lot of memory, including swapping. Is this that, reported earlier, ,,memory leak''? As a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-25 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 11:11:06 Alex Bennee wrote: 2009/2/25 Alex Bennee kernel-hac...@bennee.com: X Log attached. More detailed log with debug turned on. I'm pretty sure that with xorg-server-1.5.3 you should use EXA instead of UXA, because UXA works with DRI2, and your xorg-server

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-25 Thread Khashayar Naderehvandi
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote: Here comes a pretty significant bugfix release for the 2.6 2D series. The goal of this release is to get out the major fixes for GEM and KMS that we think we've pounded on enough to be stable -- certainly more stable than

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-25 Thread Jacek Luczak
Eric Anholt pisze: Here comes a pretty significant bugfix release for the 2.6 2D series. The goal of this release is to get out the major fixes for GEM and KMS that we think we've pounded on enough to be stable -- certainly more stable than previously. Notable fixes include a significant BO

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-25 Thread Jacek Luczak
Vasily Khoruzhick pisze: On Wednesday 25 February 2009 15:10:47 Jacek Luczak wrote: Hi Eric, this release is totally unusable while running in UXA. System eats lot of memory, including swapping. Is this that, reported earlier, ,,memory leak''? As a result X are really slow and lot of lockups

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-25 Thread Johannes Engel
Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: On Wednesday 25 February 2009 15:10:47 Jacek Luczak wrote: this release is totally unusable while running in UXA. System eats lot of memory, including swapping. Is this that, reported earlier, ,,memory leak''? As a result X are really slow and lot of lockups occur

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-25 Thread Alex Bennee
___ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-25 Thread Stefano Avallone
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 14:10:47 Jacek Luczak wrote: Eric Anholt pisze: Here comes a pretty significant bugfix release for the 2.6 2D series. The goal of this release is to get out the major fixes for GEM and KMS that we think we've pounded on enough to be stable -- certainly more

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-25 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 13:20 +0100, Khashayar Naderehvandi wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote: Here comes a pretty significant bugfix release for the 2.6 2D series. The goal of this release is to get out the major fixes for GEM and KMS that we think

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-25 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 14:10 +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote: Eric Anholt pisze: Here comes a pretty significant bugfix release for the 2.6 2D series. The goal of this release is to get out the major fixes for GEM and KMS that we think we've pounded on enough to be stable -- certainly more

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-25 Thread Brice Goglin
Eric Anholt wrote: On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 14:10 +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote: this release is totally unusable while running in UXA. System eats lot of memory, including swapping. Is this that, reported earlier, ,,memory leak''? As a result X are really slow and lot of lockups occur (everything

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-25 Thread Tony Bones
I'm getting all white blocks instead of transparencies using this driver with DRI2/UXA in compiz. Think I was getting this with previous 2.6.x drivers too. xf86-video-intel-2.6.2 libdrm- (2/24/09) Xorg-server-1.5.99.902 compiz-0.7.8 G45/X4500HD EXA works ok though, uses a lot of memory

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-25 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 24/02/2009 23:46, Eric Anholt a écrit : Here comes a pretty significant bugfix release for the 2.6 2D series. In my limited testing, here's what I have so far : - 2.6.28 + EXA : works fine, seems to have actually solved a few 855 specific bugs, fencing maybe? - 2.6.28 + UXA : Acid Mode

[ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-24 Thread Eric Anholt
Here comes a pretty significant bugfix release for the 2.6 2D series. The goal of this release is to get out the major fixes for GEM and KMS that we think we've pounded on enough to be stable -- certainly more stable than previously. Notable fixes include a significant BO memory usage reduction

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.2

2009-02-24 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 00:46:39 Eric Anholt wrote: Here comes a pretty significant bugfix release for the 2.6 2D series. The goal of this release is to get out the major fixes for GEM and KMS that we think we've pounded on enough to be stable -- certainly more stable than previously.